Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Peer-Reviewed Reflective Writing by Phase II Medical Students: A Mixed-Method Study
Abiselvi Annasekaran1, V Rajasekar1, Rajavel Murugan P2
1Department of Community Medicine, Government Thoothukudi Medical College, Thoothukudi, IND.
Background:
Reflective writing is a critical educational tool in medical training, promoting self-awareness, critical thinking, and professional growth. Peer review adds a collaborative dimension to reflective practices, enhancing depth and clarity through constructive feedback. However, challenges such as limited guidance, time constraints, and language barriers may hinder its effectiveness. This study evaluated the impact of peer-reviewed reflective writing on second-year medical students at Government Thoothukudi Medical College, India.
Methods:
A mixed-methods study was conducted with 30 second-year medical students enrolled in a Community Medicine block posting. Training sessions introduced students to Gibbs' Reflective Cycle and peer review principles using a standardized rubric. Students wrote initial reflections, participated in peer review, and revised their submissions based on feedback. Quantitative data from pre- and post-intervention surveys and rubric-based assessments of reflective writings were analyzed for improvements. Focus group discussions (FGDs) provided qualitative insights into students' experiences.
Results:
Thirty students participated in the study. Quantitative analysis showed significant improvements in perceived value (3.2 ± 0.9 to 4.5 ± 0.7, p < 0.001) and confidence in reflective writing (2.8 ± 1.0 to 4.3 ± 0.8, p < 0.001). Reflective writing quality improved in clarity (3.1 ± 0.8 to 4.6 ± 0.5), depth (2.9 ± 1.0 to 4.4 ± 0.6), and adherence to Gibbs' Cycle (3.0 ± 0.7 to 4.7 ± 0.4; p < 0.001). FGDs revealed increased reflective depth, enhanced peer collaboration, and challenges such as language barriers and time constraints.
Conclusion:
Peer-reviewed reflective writing significantly enhances reflective practices, fostering critical thinking and professional growth. Addressing challenges, such as language barriers and variability in feedback quality, can further optimize outcomes. Integrating structured peer review into medical curricula can prepare students for reflective, collaborative clinical practice.
More Related Videos
08:33A Cross-Disciplinary and Multi-Modal Experimental Design for Studying Near-Real-Time Authentic Examination Experiences
Published on: September 4, 2019
07:32Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
Published on: February 10, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
The Scientific Method
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Data Collection II
Blind Procedures
Critical Thinking II