Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Mechanical thrombectomy for mild stroke with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion: a multicenter cohort study
Gaopan Zhang1, Neng Zhang1, Jingfan Li2
1Department of Neurology, Xianyang Hospital of Yan'an University, Xianyang, China.
Background:
The clinical benefit of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for anterior circulation emergency large vessel occlusion (ELVO) in patients presenting with a mild National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (<6) remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of MT in this patient population.
Methods:
We enrolled individuals presenting with mild stroke attributable to anterior circulation LVO from three stroke centers between March 2020 and June 2024. The primary endpoint was an excellent 90-day outcome, defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-1. Functional independence at day 90 (mRS 0-2) was considered the secondary endpoint. Safety endpoints consisted of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and all-cause mortality within 90 days. Multivariable logistic regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to examine the association between MT and clinical outcomes.
Results:
In total, 140 individuals with mELVO were selected for analysis, receiving either MT [n = 48; 35 males; mean age: 59.9 years; NIHSS median: 4 (IQR 2-5)] or medical management (MM) [n = 92; 62 males; mean age: 61.9 years; NIHSS median: 3 (IQR 1-4)]. No statistically significant differences were observed between the MT and MM groups in excellent outcome (aOR = 0.93; 95% CI, 0.41-2.11), functional independence (aOR = 2.14; 95% CI, 0.77-5.91), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR = 1.63; 95% CI, 0.37-7.14), or mortality (aOR = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.02-20.94). The results remained consistent after IPTW adjustment.
Conclusion:
Among patients with mELVO, MT was not associated with significantly different outcomes compared to MM. Further investigation through randomized controlled trials is warranted.

