Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Decision Making01:20

Decision Making

904
Decision-making is a fundamental cognitive process that involves evaluating alternatives and selecting among them. This process can range from simple choices, such as deciding what to wear, to complex decisions, like choosing a major in college or a career path. The complexity of the decision often dictates the approach we use, which can be broadly categorized into two types: automatic and controlled decision-making.
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
904
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination02:55

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

95.0K
Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...
95.0K
Cognitive Dissonance01:38

Cognitive Dissonance

36.8K
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
36.8K
Decision Making: Traditional Method01:14

Decision Making: Traditional Method

5.1K
The process of hypothesis testing based on the traditional method includes calculating the critical value, testing the value of the test statistic using the sample data, and interpreting these values.
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
5.1K
Self-Discrepancy Theory02:45

Self-Discrepancy Theory

18.9K
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.  
18.9K
Deindividuation00:57

Deindividuation

30.3K
Deindividuation is a form of social influence on an individual’s behavior such that the individual engages in unusual or non-normal behavior while in a group setting. Why? Because in these group settings, the individual no longer sees themselves as an individual anymore, disinhibiting their behavior and personal restraint.
30.3K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Large language models accurately identify decision reasons in verbal reports.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Quantifying age-related disparities in outpatient psychotherapy utilization: a representation quotient analysis of routine data from 29 university clinics in Germany.

BMC health services research·2025
Same author

Reply to: "Nicotine or tobacco abstinence?"

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2022
Same author

E-cigarettes and nicotine abstinence: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society·2022
Same author

Associations between Case Fatality Rates and Self-Reported Fear of Neoplasms and Circulatory Diseases.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2019
Same author

Exploring deficient emotion regulation in adult ADHD: electrophysiological evidence.

European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K

Decomposing Intolerance of Uncertainty: No Association With Affective Decision Making in a Community Sample.

Yannik Paul1, Anya Pedersen1, Kamil Fuławka2,3

  • 1Christian-Albrechts-University of Kiel, Germany.

Computational Psychiatry (Cambridge, Mass.)
|September 22, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is linked to psychological disorders. This study explored its mechanisms using decision-making tasks but found no direct correlation between IU and observed decision patterns.

Keywords:
Decision-makingDescription-Experience GapInformation samplingIntolerance of UncertaintyLoss AversionProbability Weighting

More Related Videos

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations
09:07

Experimental Research Examining How People Can Cope with Uncertainty Through Soft Haptic Sensations

Published on: September 16, 2015

9.4K
Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat
11:18

Using the Threat Probability Task to Assess Anxiety and Fear During Uncertain and Certain Threat

Published on: September 12, 2014

15.7K
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

1.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Decision Science

Background:

  • Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU) is a significant transdiagnostic factor in psychological disorders.
  • The precise psychological mechanisms underlying IU remain incompletely understood.
  • Existing definitions suggest negativity overweighting, probability distortion, and information deficit aversion as potential mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and investigate potential psychological mechanisms of Intolerance of Uncertainty (IU).
  • To map these mechanisms onto established preference patterns in decision-making under uncertainty using Cumulative Prospect Theory (CPT).
  • To experimentally examine the relationship between self-reported IU and CPT-derived preference parameters.

Main Methods:

  • An affective decision-making experiment involving 100 participants choosing between hypothetical painkillers with probabilistic side effects.
  • Choices were presented in both description (information upfront) and experience (sampling) conditions.
  • Individual CPT parameters were estimated, and trait IU was measured via questionnaire.

Main Results:

  • Participants exhibited loss aversion, overweighting side effects relative to benefits.
  • Increased nonlinear probability weighting was observed, with overestimation of unlikely negative outcomes.
  • A Description-Experience (DE) gap was evident, with differing probability weighting patterns across conditions.
  • Crucially, no significant correlation was found between self-reported IU scores and these measured preference patterns.

Conclusions:

  • While decision-making patterns consistent with IU mechanisms were observed, they did not correlate with trait IU in this sample.
  • The experimental task may not have sufficiently induced an affective context or captured disorder-specific IU processes.
  • Further research with refined tasks is needed to precisely define IU and understand its psychological underpinnings.