Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Acetylcholine Re-Challenge After Intracoronary Nitroglycerine Administration
Published on: April 4, 2022
Nicorandil Use and Health Status Outcomes in Patients with Angina Pectoris: A Prospective, Multicenter, Cohort Study
Xiliang Zhao1, Guojie Cheng2, Liling Sun3
1Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People's Republic of China.
Purpose:
Coronary artery disease represents a major clinical burden, and angina pectoris is the most frequent manifestation of coronary artery disease. Nicorandil is commonly used for the management of angina pectoris; however, its effects on health status outcomes are unclear.
Patients And Methods:
This multicenter, prospective, cohort study (GREAT) enrolled 1556 adult coronary artery disease patients with angina pectoris from nine hospitals in China. Patients were classified into nicorandil and control groups. The primary outcome was the change in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score (SAQ-SS) from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes included changes in SAQ-SS at 3, 6, and 9 months. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce bias and control for confounding factors.
Results:
We analyzed 1528 patients with baseline and 12-month health status data. After PSM, 450 matched pairs of patients were identified. A difference of ≥5 points for SAQ-SS is considered clinically significant. Patients in the nicorandil group reported greater mean improvement in SAQ-SS (17.6 ± 14.0, difference: 2.50, 95% CI: 0.74-4.27; P=0.003) at 12 months compared with the control group (15.1 ± 13.0; P=0.003). Similar trends were noted in SAQ-SS at 3, 6, and 9 months. Additionally, nicorandil users exhibited significantly greater improvements in the SAQ physical limitation (11.7 ± 16.9 vs 8.4 ± 16.9; difference: 3.27, 95% CI, 1.05-5.48; P =0.001) and SAQ-QoL domain (18.9 ± 21.4 vs 16.3 ± 20.4; difference: 2.62, 95% CI, -0.12 to 5.35; P=0.042) at 12 months. Most patients in the entire cohort (78.4%) reported a clinical improvement in SAQ-SS. The nicorandil group had a higher proportion of patients with at least large improvements (≥20 points) in SAQ-SS (42.5% vs 32.9%; difference: 9.7%, 95% CI: 3.3-16.0; P= 0.004).
Conclusion:
Among patients with angina pectoris, anti-angina treatment improved the majority of patients' health status. Nicorandil-based regimens were associated with a greater health status outcome improvement compared to those not using nicorandil in coronary artery disease patients with angina pectoris. A substantial proportion of patients using nicorandil exhibited noteworthy improvements in health status outcomes at one year.
Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05050773.
More Related Videos
10:28Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
18:11A Research Method For Detecting Transient Myocardial Ischemia In Patients With Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome Using Continuous ST-segment Analysis
Published on: December 28, 2012
Related Concept Videos
Angina V: Nursing Management
Angina III: Clinical Manifestations and Assessment
Angina IV: Management
Antianginal Drugs: Nitrates and β-Blockers
Organic nitrates, such as nitroglycerin, play a pivotal role. Once metabolized, they liberate nitric oxide, a molecular marvel. Nitric oxide triggers guanylyl cyclase and augments cGMP production. This biochemical cascade orchestrates the relaxation of vascular smooth muscles, ushering in vasodilation and enhancing coronary blood flow....
Antianginal Drugs: Calcium Channel Blockers and Ranolazine
CCBs, a diverse class that includes dihydropyridines (nifedipine) and diphenylalkylamines (verapamil and diltiazem), exert their effect by blocking calcium channels in cardiac and smooth muscle cells. This...
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies