Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Introducing the Tile/SED/Array Interface for Rapid Field of View Positioning in Tissue Imaging
Published on: September 15, 2023
Fragmenting any Parallelepiped into a Signed Tiling
Joseph Doolittle1, Alex McDonough2
1Institute of Geometry, TU Graz, Graz, Austria.
None:
It is broadly known that any parallelepiped tiles space by translating copies of itself along its edges. In earlier work relating to higher-dimensional sandpile groups, the second author discovered a novel construction which fragments the parallelepiped into a collection of smaller tiles. These tiles fill space with the same symmetry as the larger parallelepiped. Their volumes are equal to the components of the multi-row Laplace determinant expansion, so this construction only works when all of these signs are non-negative (or non-positive). In this work, we extend the construction to work for all parallelepipeds, without requiring the non-negative condition. This naturally gives tiles with negative volume, which we understand to mean canceling out tiles with positive volume. In fact, with this cancellation, we prove that every point in space is contained in exactly one more tile with positive volume than tile with negative volume. This is a natural definition for a signed tiling. Our main technique is to show that the net number of signed tiles doesn't change as a point moves through space. This is a relatively indirect proof method, and the underlying structure of these tilings remains mysterious.
Related Concept Videos
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Plastic Deformations of Members with a Single Plane of Symmetry
Graphical Representation of Inequalities
Parallel-Axis Theorem for an Area
For a flywheel approximated as a solid disc, consider an infinitesimal differential element with an arbitrary distance...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...
Theorems of Pappus and Guldinus: Problem Solving

