Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Non-invasive Assessments of Subjective and Objective Recovery Characteristics Following an Exhaustive Jump Protocol
Published on: June 8, 2017
Strength-Dependent Differences in the Magnitude and Time Course of Post-Activation Performance Enhancement in High
Javier Sanchez-Sanchez1, Alejandro Rodríguez-Fernández2
1Research Group Planning and Assessment of Training and Athletic Performance, Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca, 37007 Salamanca, Spain.
Abstract:
Background: A post-activation performance enhancement (PAPE) can acutely improve explosive actions, but its time course may be influenced by individual strength levels. Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the performance responses following three PAPE protocols, considering the strength level as a modulating factor in trained high jump athletes. Methods: Twenty-one male high jumpers (Tier 3) were divided into stronger (SG, n = 10) and weaker (WG, n = 11) groups based on the median load (80 kg) lifted at 0.8 m/s in a velocity-based half-squat test. The participants completed three squat-based PAPE protocols (velocity loss thresholds of 5%, 10%, and 15%) in a randomized, double-blind crossover design. Their performance in a 10 m sprint (S10) and a countermovement jump (CMJ) was assessed at baseline and 0, 4, 8, and 12 min post-intervention. Results: No significant three-way interactions were observed for the S10 or CMJ performance (p > 0.05). The absolute CMJ performance was consistently higher in the SG across all the time points (p < 0.001, d = 1.25, large), with significant peak values observed at 4 min post-activation. However, both groups exhibited transient improvements in their S10 and CMJ performance that were statistically significant (p < 0.05) and of a large magnitude (d = 1.93-3.15), observed at 4 and/or 8 min post-activation, which subsequently declined by 12 min. Conclusions: The strength level modulates both the time course and the magnitude of the PAPE. Stronger athletes responded better to both less and more demanding protocols (5% to 15% velocity loss thresholds) with a 4-8 min recovery, whereas weaker athletes benefited mainly from less demanding stimuli (5% velocity loss thresholds), provided that the recovery was sufficient (≈4 min) to allow potentiation to emerge. However, with more demanding protocols (15% velocity loss thresholds), a longer recovery period (≈8 min) appears necessary.
Related Concept Videos
Long-term Potentiation
Hebbian LTP
LTP can occur when...
Long-term Potentiation
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...
Muscle Stimulation Frequency
Wave summation
At low firing rates, motor neurons induce individual twitch contractions in muscle fibers. These twitches...
Social Facilitation

