Related Experiment Video
Updated: Apr 28, 2026

Errors as a Means of Reducing Impulsive Food Choice
Published on: June 5, 2016
Optimal Design of an Added-Sugar Menu Warning Label: A Randomized Experiment
Brittany Lemmon1, Andrea Gil2, Aviva A Musicus3
1Graduate Group in Epidemiology, University of California Davis, Davis, California.
Introduction:
Restaurant menu added-sugar warning labels have the potential to reduce added-sugar consumption. Label efficacy depends on noticeability. This study aimed to assess which design elements improve noticeability and recognizability and also assessed behavioral response to the labels.
Study Design:
An online randomized experiment was used.
Setting/Participants:
A national sample of adults (N=4,083) was recruited to approximate U.S. distributions of sex, age, race, ethnicity, and education.
Intervention:
A pretest-determined triangle shape was used for the label icon in the main experiment. The main experiment used a 3 × 2 × 2 × 2 factorial design to test label type (icon-plus-text versus boxed icon-only versus icon-only label), color (red versus black), size (150% vs 100% of menu text height), and placement (right versus left side of item name). Participants viewed fast-food and full-service restaurant menus displaying the assigned label next to high-added-sugar items (containing >50% of the daily recommended limit).
Main Outcome Measures:
Noticing a high-added-sugar label and recognizing one's assigned label among other labels were assessed and analyzed in 2024. Menu-ordering behaviors were also examined.
Results:
Compared with icon-only labels, icon-plus-text labels increased the probability of noticing and recognizing high-added-sugar labels by 508% (7% vs 44%) and 263% (23% vs 82%) (ps<0.001), respectively. Red color increased noticing by 16% (p=0.020) and recognition by 20% (p<0.001) compared with black color. Larger height increased recognition by 13% (p=0.001). For icon-only labels, right placement increased noticing by 59% (p=0.020). Icon-plus-text labels reduced the probability of ordering a high-added-sugar item by 11% and the amount of added sugar ordered by 10.5 g (ps<0.001) compared with icon-only labels.
Conclusions:
Icon-plus-text labels were substantially more noticeable as high-added-sugar labels, recognizable, and efficacious at reducing the amount of added sugar ordered than icon-only labels. To a lesser extent, red color, larger labels, and right placement additionally improved performance, especially for icon-only designs, although they did not improve efficacy to a level similar to that of icon-plus-text labels.
Trial Registration:
This trial is registered at AsPredicted.org (Number 156625) and ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT0620491).
Related Concept Videos
Factorial Design
Study Design in Statistics
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
Experimental Designs
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Dosage Regimen Designs: Nomograms and Tabulations
Methods of Medium Optimization

