Evaluating the significance of combining PD-L1 and TILs as biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immunotherapy: a systematic review

  • 0Amsterdam UMC location VUMC, Department of Pulmonary Medicine, De Boelelaan, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. y.derraze@amsterdamumc.nl.

|

|

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Combining programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) shows stronger prediction for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This combined approach offers improved prognostic value over individual biomarkers.

Area Of Science

  • Oncology
  • Immunology
  • Biomarker Research

Background

  • Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) response in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but its predictive power is suboptimal.
  • Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), especially CD8+ T cells, are emerging as potential complementary biomarkers in NSCLC.
  • The combined predictive value of PD-L1 and TILs for ICI treatment outcomes in NSCLC remains incompletely understood.

Purpose Of The Study

  • To systematically evaluate the predictive value of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
  • To assess the combined effect of PD-L1 and TILs on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients treated with ICIs.

Main Methods

  • Systematic literature search conducted across Ovid/Medline, Embase, and Web of Science databases.
  • Included studies focused on NSCLC patients treated with ICIs, analyzing PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TILs.
  • Primary outcomes analyzed were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included objective response rate (ORR) and durable clinical benefit (DCB). Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

Main Results

  • Thirteen studies comprising 2490 patients were included in the meta-analysis.
  • PD-L1 expression alone was associated with improved PFS (HR: 0.67) but not significantly with OS.
  • TILs alone did not show significant predictive value for PFS or OS. However, the combination of PD-L1 and TILs demonstrated the strongest predictive value for both PFS (HR: 0.39) and OS (HR: 0.42).

Conclusions

  • The combined assessment of PD-L1 expression and CD8+ TILs offers superior predictive value for progression-free survival and overall survival in NSCLC patients undergoing ICI therapy compared to either biomarker alone.
  • Integrating both PD-L1 and TILs into predictive models may enhance patient selection for immune checkpoint inhibitors, although clinical implementation requires further consideration.
  • Further research is warranted to optimize the clinical application of combined PD-L1 and TILs biomarkers in NSCLC treatment strategies.