Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
Return on investment from interventions to prevent common mental disorders among adolescents in Australia: A
Alexander J Thomas1, Nicola Reavley2, Tharindu Wickramaarachi1
1Modelling and Biostatistics, Burnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Objective:
The prevalence of common mental disorders (CMDs, depression/anxiety) among Australian adolescents is increasing. Evidence is needed to inform how prevention efforts can be focused for greatest impact. This study used a compartmental model to estimate how investments could be optimally allocated across interventions to prevent CMDs in adolescents, and the corresponding health and economic benefits.
Methods:
The Australian 0- to 19-year-old population was disaggregated by age (0-9, 10-14, 15-19), sex (male, female) and CMD experience (never, currently, previously). Twelve prevention interventions were included following targeted reviews. The model was calibrated to Australian population survey data and included sociodemographic risk factors from the literature that were relevant for included interventions (bullying, financial stress, poor school connectedness, racial discrimination, child maltreatment). An optimisation estimated how an additional AUD$50 million-AUD$1 billion per annum over 2024-2050 could be allocated across interventions to maximise the number of adolescents turning 20 without a lifetime experience of CMD.
Results:
The benefit-cost ratios of interventions varied widely depending on whether they impacted CMDs directly or indirectly by reducing a risk factor, and also whether CMD was their primary purpose or not (e.g. poverty interventions). Optimally investing AUD$50 million-AUD$1 billion p.a. over 2024-2050 could lead to 144,577-791,277 fewer adolescents experiencing a CMD by age 20 (AUD$5064-AUD$18,507/lifetime CMD experience averted), with lower bound benefit-cost ratios ranging from 5.0 to 19.2. Optimally, budget allocations should include combinations of interventions targeting different age groups, sub-populations and risk factors.
Conclusions:
Investing in evidence-based prevention interventions for adolescent mental health is likely to have a favourable return-on-investment.
More Related Videos
05:48The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
Published on: June 12, 2020
08:25Polar Histogram Visualization of Acute Stress Disorder Scale Scores for Comprehensive Clinical Assessment
Published on: December 6, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Modeling in Therapy
Participant Modeling
Participant modeling involves therapists demonstrating calm and effective behaviors in...
Community Based Intervention
Foundations of Community Mental Health Programs
Central to the success of community-based interventions is the...
Treatment Strategies for Psychological Disorders
Psychological therapies focus on modifying emotions, thoughts, and behaviors through talking, interpreting, listening, rewarding, challenging, and modeling. Clinical psychologists, counselors, and social workers commonly practice psychotherapy. Clinical...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention II
The agent-host-environment model states that disease results...
Models of Health Promotion and Illness Prevention I
The health belief model (HBM) attempts to predict health-related behavior in specific belief patterns. According to the HBM, a person's...
Autism Spectrum Disorder
These core symptoms manifest differently among individuals, ranging from mild to severe. The disorder's complexity extends beyond its clinical presentation, encompassing a diverse range of biological, cognitive, and sociocultural influences.