Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Lumped-Parameter and Finite Element Modeling of Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction
Published on: February 13, 2021
Artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram model for predicting heart failure with preserved ejection
David Hong1, Sung-Hee Song2, Heayoung Shin1
1Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Heart Vascular Stroke Institute, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06351, Republic of Korea.
Aims:
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is difficult to diagnose due to the lack of a definitive diagnostic marker; multiple tests are required, including advanced evaluations. This study aimed to develop an artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiogram (ECG) model for predicting HFpEF.
Methods And Results:
This retrospective cohort study included patients from a single tertiary centre who underwent echocardiography, N-terminal prohormone of B-type natriuretic peptide measurement, and ECG within a defined timeframe. Patients were classified as HFpEF (HFA-PEFF score ≥5) or control (HFA-PEFF score <5). Patients were divided into training, validation, and test subsets at a 7:1:2 ratio for model development and validation. Using the collected ECGs, a convolutional neural network was trained to predict HFpEF; its performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC). Among the 13 081 patients included, 5795 (44.3%) were classified as HFpEF and 7286 (55.7%) were classified as control. The AI-enabled ECG model demonstrated good discriminative performance [AUROC 0.81; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.79-0.82]. Subgroup analyses stratified by HFpEF risk factors confirmed consistent model performance. Prognostic evaluation revealed that patients with a positive AI-ECG classification experienced significantly worse outcomes relative to those with a negative classification, including higher risks of cardiac death (1.1% vs. 0.1%; hazard ratio 9.56; 95% CI 1.24-73.53; P = 0.030) and heart failure hospitalization (2.8% vs. 0.6%; hazard ratio 5.91; 95% CI 2.08-16.81; P = 0.001) at 5 year.
Conclusion:
The AI-ECG model is a reliable tool for predicting HFpEF, as defined by the HFA-PEFF score, and effectively stratifies patients according to prognosis. Integration of this model into clinical practice may simplify and enhance the diagnostic process for HFpEF.
Related Concept Videos
Electrocardiogram
Three major waveforms are present in a typical ECG recording: the P wave, the QRS complex, and...
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Correlation between ECG and Cardiac Cycle
A cardiac action potential originates in the SA node and spreads throughout the atria and the AV node in approximately 0.03 seconds. This results in the P wave in an ECG and triggers atrial contraction. The action potential is then briefly slowed at the AV node, allowing the atria to contract and fill the ventricles with blood before...
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure

