Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026
Upper-extremity Approach for Secondary Access in Transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation
Published on: August 8, 2025
Construct validity of automated assessment of invasively measured hemodynamics during transcatheter aortic valve
Niels A Stens1,2, Geert A A Versteeg1, Maxim J P Rooijakkers1
1Department of Cardiology, Radboud University Medical Center, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Aims:
Paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) is frequently observed following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR). Periprocedural monitoring of invasive hemodynamics has shown promise for diagnosis of PVR, but automated software options are lacking. We aimed to develop a rule-based algorithm for automated assessment of hemodynamic indices of PVR, and evaluate its construct validity and discriminatory value for cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR)-derived relevant PVR compared to standard manual hemodynamic assessment.
Methods And Results:
Left ventricular and aortic pressures were invasively measured during TAVR using fluid-filled pigtail catheters. To evaluate construct validity of automated vs. manual assessment of invasive hemodynamics, we compared (i) proportion of cardiac cycles affected by arrhythmias/noise, (ii) pressure gradients, and (iii) PVR indices. Additionally, we compared the discriminatory value of automatically and manually determined PVR indices for CMR-determined relevant PVR at 30-days. In total, 77 patients were enrolled (664 cardiac cycles). Automated filtering of cardiac cycles affected by arrhythmias/noise had a high sensitivity (95.2%) and specificity (86.4%). In addition, excellent agreement was observed between automated and manual computation of mean gradients pre- and post-TAVR [39.3 ± 12.1 vs. 37.5 ± 11.9 mmHg, intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC): 0.916; 1.92 ± 5.87 vs. 1.14 ± 5.89, ICC: 0.957, respectively], and PVR indices [diastolic delta (DD): 41.7 ± 12.4 vs. 40.6 ± 12.3 mmHg, ICC: 0.982, respectively]. Automated and manual assessment of DD showed comparable discriminatory value for relevant PVR [area under the curve (AUC): 0.81 vs. 0.80, respectively].
Conclusion:
Rule-based, automated assessment of hemodynamic indices of PVR showed excellent construct validity and discriminatory value for CMR-determined relevant PVR, supporting its use for real-time evaluation and risk stratification in TAVR patients.
