Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

A Practical Guide for the Production and PET/CT Imaging of 68Ga-DOTATATE for Neuroendocrine Tumors in Daily Clinical Practice
Published on: April 17, 2019
A Novel TRG-N Prognostic Classification System for Esophageal Cancer Undergoing Neoadjuvant Therapy Followed by
Jingpu Wang1, Zhouqiao Wu2, Rob H A Verhoeven3,4,5
1Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Objective:
To develop a new prognostic classification system centered on tumor regression grade (TRG) and ypN stage that can effectively stratify overall survival (OS) of esophageal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy followed by R0 esophagectomy.
Background:
Although the prognostic value of combining TRG and ypN stage has been demonstrated, a prognostic classification system integrating these factors, trained using large-scale data, remains unavailable.
Methods:
Data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (2015-2022) were analyzed. A new TRG-N prognostic classification system for OS was developed by grouping patients based on cN stage, ypN stage, and TRG. The prognostic performance of the TRG-N classification was compared with the eighth edition AJCC ypTNM classification using 4 comparative metrics [log-rank χ², linear trend χ², Akaike information criterion (AIC), and C-index].
Results:
A total of 3193 patients were included. Among patients with adenocarcinoma, the TRG-N classification showed superior linear trend χ² and AIC to the ypTNM classification. However, the log-rank χ² of the TRG-N classification was inferior to that of the ypTNM classification, with no significant difference in the C-index ( P =0.206) between the 2 systems. Among patients with squamous cell carcinoma, the TRG-N classification significantly outperformed the ypTNM classification in log-rank χ², linear trend χ², AIC, and C-index ( P =0.018).
Conclusions:
The TRG-N classification demonstrated comparable prognostic performance to the AJCC ypTNM classification for esophageal adenocarcinoma but showed superior prognostic value for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, making it a potentially more effective tool for risk stratification in esophageal cancer patients.
Related Concept Videos
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...

