Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Sequential Application of Glass Coverslips to Assess the Compressive Stiffness of the Mouse Lens: Strain and Morphometric Analyses
Published on: May 3, 2016
Theoretical influence of segmented axial length on intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes
Giacomo Savini1, Kenneth J Hoffer, Daniela Nicolosi
1From the IRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy (Savini, Schiano-Lomoriello); St. Mary's Eye Center, Santa Monica, California (Hoffer); Stein Eye Institute, Los Angeles, California (Hoffer); Sifi Medtech Srl, Catania, Italy (Nicolosi); Great Lakes Eye Care, Saint Joseph, Michigan (Cooke); Department of Neurology and Ophthalmology, Michigan State University, College of Osteopathic Medicine, East Lansing, Michigan (Cooke); Studio Oculistico d'Azeglio, Bologna, Italy (Coutinho, Grendele); Dipartimento di Farmacia e Biotecnologie, Alma Mater Studiorium Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Coutinho).
Purpose:
To compare the segmented axial length (AL) provided by the Argos with the traditional AL provided by the IOLMaster 700 in short eyes and assess their impact on intraocular lens (IOL) power calculation.
Setting:
IRCCS Bietti Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Design:
Retrospective case series.
Methods:
Patients undergoing cataract or refractive surgery preoperative examinations were enrolled if their AL was <22.0 mm with the IOLMaster 700. The ALs given by the 2 biometers were compared. Using the formulas included in the ESCRS IOL calculator, the IOL power for a schematic eye was calculated with both AL measurements.
Results:
In 78 eyes, the traditional mean AL (21.22 ± 0.54 mm) was shorter than the segmented AL (21.29 ± 0.51 mm, P < .0001) with a proportional bias (r2 = 0.3312, P < .0001). The difference decreased with thicker lenses (r2 = 0.4941, P < .0001). Based on the IOL power calculated when the traditional AL was entered and the first negative refractive value was aimed at, the predicted refraction was more myopic with the Argos AL (P < .0001). The difference ranged from -0.18 ± 0.13 D (Cooke K6) to -0.24 ± 0.18 D (Barrett Universal II). The same IOL power would have been recommended by the ESCRS IOL calculator in only 40% to 50% of eyes, irrespective of formula used. The difference was minimized when the sum-of-segments option was used.
Conclusions:
AL measurements provided by the Argos and IOLMaster 700 are not interchangeable for IOL power calculation in short eyes <22.0 mm.
More Related Videos
06:55Scanning Light Scattering Profiler SLPS Based Methodology to Quantitatively Evaluate Forward and Backward Light Scattering from Intraocular Lenses
Published on: June 6, 2017
05:56Scleral Cross-linking Using Riboflavin and Ultraviolet-A Radiation for Prevention of Axial Myopia in a Rabbit Model
Published on: April 3, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Focusing of Light in the Eye
Glaucoma: Overview
Thin-Walled Hollow Shafts
Angle Closure Glaucoma: Treatment
Eccentric Axial Loading in a Plane of Symmetry