Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Group Design02:01

Group Design

The most basic experimental design involves two groups: the experimental group and the control group. The two groups are designed to be the same except for one difference— experimental manipulation. The experimental group gets the experimental manipulation—that is, the treatment or variable being tested—and the control group does not. Since experimental manipulation is the only difference between the experimental and control groups, we can be sure that any differences between the two are due to...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification03:00

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model01:29

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Model

The Self-Evaluation Maintenance (SEM) model offers a psychological framework to understand how individuals’ self-esteem is influenced by the achievements of others, particularly those with whom they share close personal bonds. The SEM model operates when personal rather than social identity guides individuals. Central to this model is the notion that individuals have an inherent desire to preserve a favorable self-image, which is continuously shaped by interpersonal comparisons and...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Optimizing social risk screening for hospitalized older adults preparing for postacute care: A patient-perspective qualitative usability study of the Assessing Circumstances and Offering Resources for Needs screening tool.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same authorSame journal

Creating change through short-term pilots and rapid cycle testing: a case of cardiovascular risk reduction.

BMJ open quality·2026
Same author

A Roadmap for Implementing Virtual Geriatric Mental Health Services for Rural Veterans: Qualitative Longitudinal Evaluation.

JMIR aging·2026
Same author

Quality of hospital medicine care in Veterans Affairs hospitals versus non-Veterans Affairs hospitals: A systematic review of comparative studies.

Journal of hospital medicine·2026
Same author

Prevalence and Treatment of Anxiety and Depression Among US Healthcare Workers, 2021-2024.

Journal of general internal medicine·2026
Same author

Reliability of a rating rubric to assess quality of preoperative goals of care notes.

American journal of surgery·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: May 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K

On the same (evaluation) page: a novel approach to enhance mixed-methods implementation evaluation.

Laura Ellen Ashcraft1,2, Amanda D Peeples3, Daniel Hall4,5

  • 1Center for Healthcare Evaluation, Resaerch, and Promotion (CHERP), VA Medical Center Corporal Michael J Crescenz, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA lauraellen.ashcraft@pennmedicine.upenn.edu.

BMJ Open Quality
|September 23, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study presents a novel seven-step process for developing rigorous evaluation plans for complex quality improvement and implementation science projects. This method enhances coordination and rigor for interdisciplinary teams working remotely.

Keywords:
Implementation scienceQuality improvementQuality improvement methodologiesTeamsTeamwork

More Related Videos

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.2K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: May 14, 2026

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting
14:43

A Novel Method for Involving Women of Color at High Risk for Preterm Birth in Research Priority Setting

Published on: January 12, 2018

12.5K
Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View
05:26

Enactive Phenomenological Approach to the Trier Social Stress Test: A Mixed Methods Point of View

Published on: January 7, 2019

7.2K
The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time
06:05

The Participant-Reported Implementation Update and Score PRIUS: A Novel Method for Capturing Implementation-Related Data Over Time

Published on: February 19, 2021

1.6K

Area of Science:

  • Health Services Research
  • Implementation Science
  • Mixed Methods Research

Background:

  • Quality improvement and implementation science evaluations often use complex mixed methods approaches with interdisciplinary teams.
  • The COVID-19 pandemic and shift to remote work introduced significant challenges to these evaluations.
  • Existing tools were insufficient for rigorous evaluation planning with geographically distributed, remotely working teams.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To create a novel, replicable, seven-step process for developing a rigorous evaluation plan for a large, hybrid implementation-evaluation trial.
  • To address the challenges of conducting complex evaluations with remotely working, interdisciplinary teams.

Main Methods:

  • A seven-step process was developed: 1) select template and point person, 2) initial development, 3) asynchronous feedback, 4) gap analysis, 5) virtual synchronous discussion, 6) finalize document, 7) apply and solicit feedback.
  • The process was applied to a large hybrid type III implementation-evaluation trial across nine medical centers.
  • Incorporated team science approaches to enhance evaluation plan development.

Main Results:

  • The novel seven-step evaluation plan tool enhanced the rigor and execution of a large program evaluation.
  • The process facilitated clear communication, well-ordered workflow, and rigorous operationalization of evaluation aims.
  • The evaluation plan development process served as a convening function, enhancing coordination among remote team members.

Conclusions:

  • A structured, seven-step process can improve the rigor and cohesion of mixed methods evaluations for interdisciplinary teams, particularly those working remotely.
  • This novel approach provides a replicable framework for developing robust evaluation plans in complex implementation science projects.
  • The developed process supports team coordination and effective operationalization of evaluation goals in challenging research environments.