Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Quasistatic Mechanical Testing for Computer-Aided Design and Manufacturing Occlusal Veneers Cemented to Milled Dentin Analog Material
Published on: December 20, 2024
Effects of different cement-restorative material combinations in full-coverage onlay restorations: A FEA study
Andrea Baldi1, Alessandro Scattina2, Allegra Comba1
1Department of Surgical Sciences, Dental School Lingotto, University of Turin, Italy.
Finite Element Analysis (FEA) revealed that resin-matrix ceramics in indirect adhesive restorations experience higher stresses, particularly with reduced restoration thickness. Cement type showed minimal impact, except for resin-matrix ceramics where low shrinkage cements performed better.
Area of Science:
- Biomaterials Science
- Dental Materials
- Finite Element Analysis (FEA)
Background:
- Indirect adhesive restorations (IAR) are crucial in modern dentistry for restoring tooth structure.
- Understanding the mechanical behavior of different cement-material combinations is essential for IAR longevity.
- Finite Element Analysis (FEA) provides a powerful tool for simulating stress distribution in complex dental structures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate stress distribution in indirect adhesive restorations using FEA.
- To compare the performance of various cement-material combinations under simulated chewing loads.
- To analyze the influence of restorative material type and cement properties on interfacial stresses.
Main Methods:
- A 3D Finite Element (FE) model of a lower first molar overlay restoration was created from micro-CT scans.
- Simulations involved applying axial chewing loads to linear elastic models of enamel, dentin, restorative materials, and cements.
- Analysis focused on shear stress and normal pressure at the tooth-cement and cement-restoration interfaces.
Main Results:
- Resin-matrix ceramic restorations exhibited the highest stresses, attributed to restoration flexion exacerbated by reduced occlusal thickness and lack of axial walls.
- Glass-matrix and polycrystalline ceramic restorations showed lower stress levels.
- Cement type (dual-cure resin vs. light-curable composite) had a minor impact on stress, with slight differences noted primarily under resin-matrix ceramics.
Conclusions:
- Resin-matrix ceramics are susceptible to higher interfacial stresses in overlay restorations, influenced by design factors.
- Cement selection appears less critical than restorative material choice, though low polymerization shrinkage cements are preferable for resin-matrix ceramics.
- FEA is valuable for predicting mechanical performance and guiding material selection in indirect adhesive restorations.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in...
Porosity in Cement Paste
The balance of water to cement in the mix is...
Bonding and Strength of Aggregate
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Fineness of Cement
Direct...

