Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats
Published on: July 18, 2025
Consequences in critically ill patients with prolonged mechanical ventilation after diaphragmatic stimulation
Objective:
Prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) may lead to poor outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to investigate the effects of diaphragmatic stimulation on the duration of MV (DMV), the intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (ILOS), the proportion of patients successfully weaned and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP) in patients with prolonged MV.
Design:
Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Data Sources:
Cochrane library, Embase, Pubmed and Web of Science up to December 2024.
Eligibility Criteria For Selecting Studies:
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies evaluating the outcomes of patients with prolonged MV after diaphragmatic stimulation were included up to December 2024.
Data Extraction And Synthesis:
All articles were independently assessed by two reviewers, and a third reviewer was consulted to resolve different evaluations. Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cochrane Collaboration tool in RevMan V.5.3 software (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014) were applied to assess the quality of cohort studies or RCTs. The meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan V.5.3 software, applying a random-effects model and presenting results with 95% CIs. Heterogeneity was examined using the Higgins I² statistic, and subgroup analyses were carried out to investigate possible contributors to heterogeneity. Sensitivity analyses were further conducted in Stata 18.0 (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX, USA). Potential publication bias was assessed through funnel plots combined with Egger's regression test. For each outcome, the certainty of evidence was appraised according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE).
Results:
Ten studies involving 802 patients (349 received diaphragmatic stimulation) were included. The meta-analysis indicated that patients receiving diaphragmatic stimulation had shorter DMV (mean differences (MD) -5.69 d, 95% CI -10.99 to -0.39, p=0.04) and ILOS (MD -5.48 d, 95% CI -10.72 to -0.24, p=0.04). The proportion of patients successfully weaned was larger in patients with diaphragmatic stimulation (risk ratios (RR) 1.25, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.53, p=0.04). The MIP increased compared with the control group.
Conclusions:
The promising results suggest that diaphragmatic stimulation has the potential to shorten DMV and ILOS and accelerate weaning from ventilator.
Prospero Registration Number:
CRD42024599512.
Insights
Diaphragmatic stimulation may shorten the duration of mechanical ventilation (MV) and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. This intervention also increases the success rate of weaning patients from ventilators.
Area of Science:
- Critical Care Medicine
- Pulmonology
- Respiratory Therapy
Background:
- Prolonged mechanical ventilation (MV) is associated with adverse patient outcomes.
- Effective strategies to reduce MV duration and improve weaning are crucial in intensive care settings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the impact of diaphragmatic stimulation on key outcomes in patients requiring prolonged MV.
- To evaluate effects on duration of MV (DMV), ICU length of stay (ILOS), successful weaning rates, and maximum inspiratory pressure (MIP).
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies.
- Searched Cochrane library, Embase, PubMed, and Web of Science up to December 2024.
- Assessed study quality using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Cochrane Collaboration tool; meta-analysis performed using RevMan V.5.3 with random-effects model.
Main Results:
- Ten studies with 802 patients (349 received diaphragmatic stimulation) were included.
- Diaphragmatic stimulation significantly reduced DMV (MD -5.69 d) and ILOS (MD -5.48 d).
- Successful weaning proportion increased (RR 1.25), and MIP improved compared to controls.
Conclusions:
- Diaphragmatic stimulation shows promise in reducing DMV and ILOS.
- This intervention may accelerate ventilator weaning and improve respiratory muscle strength.
- Further research supports diaphragmatic stimulation as a beneficial strategy for prolonged MV patients.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Tracheostomy Decannulation
Description of the Procedure
Decannulation refers to the permanent removal of the tracheostomy tube, signaling the resolution of the condition that initially necessitated the tracheostomy. The process requires a well-coordinated interplay between...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III
Physiological Control of Respiration
Breathing, a seemingly passive process, is regulated by the respiratory center in the brainstem. This center coordinates the involuntary control of respirations, which means it occurs without conscious effort, ensuring a smooth and uninterrupted pattern.
Regulation of Ventilation
The body maintains ventilation by monitoring levels of carbon dioxide (CO2), oxygen (O2), and hydrogen ion concentration (pH) in the arterial blood. Among these factors, the level of CO2 plays a crucial...

