Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Dynamic Monitoring of Seroconversion using a Multianalyte Immunobead Assay for Covid-19
Published on: February 16, 2022
A composite symptoms severity score based on survey self-reports as a predictor of SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral
Damian Diaz1, Jesse A Canchola2, Ana M Groh1
1Department of Internal Medicine, Infectious Diseases, Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.
Background:
Establishing a strong correlation between active SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity could enhance early risk assessment, predict disease outcomes, and identify patients needing urgent treatment.
Methods:
In this prospective SARS-CoV-2 transmission cohort study, we introduce the potential of a symptoms severity score (S3) based on patient self-reported symptoms and further evaluate its utility for predicting SARS-CoV-2 infection status and viral load. The S3 construct, derived from a participant survey using pre-defined scales (Cronbach's alpha=0.7), was categorized as asymptomatic, mild to moderate, or severe. This analysis comprised nine household contacts, contributing 1,410 qualitative and 89 quantitative visit‑test observations.
Results:
S3 showed a high correlation with total symptoms (Pearson r = 0.963, p < 0.0001). The categorized version (S3C) also correlated strongly with the number of symptoms (Spearman's r = 0.988, p < 0.0001). A generalized estimating equation (GEE) model revealed that participants with severe symptoms had 6.5 times higher odds of having an active SARS-CoV-2 infection than those with no symptoms (Odds Ratio = 6.5, 95% CI: 3.5 to 12.4, p < 0.0001). Similar significant results were found for severe vs. mild to moderate symptoms (OR = 2.3, CI: 1.3 to 4.1, p = 0.0025) and mild to moderate vs. asymptomatic (OR = 2.8, 95% CI: 1.4 to 5.4, p = 0.0030).
Conclusions:
Our findings demonstrate that self-reported symptom severity and number of symptoms are robust predictors of SARS-CoV-2 infection and viral load, providing potential utility in clinical risk stratification. However, limitations, including a small sample size for viral load analyses and reliance on self-reported data, should be considered.
More Related Videos
08:41Live Imaging and Quantification of Viral Infection in K18 hACE2 Transgenic Mice Using Reporter-Expressing Recombinant SARS-CoV-2
Published on: November 5, 2021
08:07Author Spotlight: Advancing Antiviral Strategies Through Novel Immunocapture and Mass Spectrometry Techniques
Published on: January 12, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-IV: Assessement and Diagnostic Studies
Medical History
Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms-SNPs
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Factors Affecting Illness
For instance, risk factors are connected to illness,...
Pericarditis II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Tests