Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

183
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
183
Randomized Experiments01:13

Randomized Experiments

8.9K
The randomization process involves assigning study participants randomly to experimental or control groups based on their probability of being equally assigned. Randomization is meant to eliminate selection bias and balance known and unknown confounding factors so that the control group is similar to the treatment group as much as possible. A computer program and a random number generator can be used to assign participants to groups in a way that minimizes bias.
Simple randomization
Simple...
8.9K
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

228
Body:Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to...
228
Study Design in Statistics01:15

Study Design in Statistics

9.9K
A study design is a set of techniques that allow a researcher to collect and analyze data from different variables defined for a specific research problem. Statistics is commonly for effective study design and more robust experiments,
Does aspirin reduce the risk of heart attacks? Is one brand of fertilizer more effective at growing roses than another? Is fatigue as dangerous to a driver as the influence of alcohol? Questions like these are answered using randomized experiments with proper...
9.9K
Cluster Sampling Method01:20

Cluster Sampling Method

14.0K
Appropriate sampling methods ensure that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
To choose a cluster sample, divide the population into clusters (groups) and then randomly select some of the clusters. All the members from these clusters are in the cluster sample. For example, if you randomly sample four departments from your...
14.0K
Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

902
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
902

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regenerative Polysulfide-Scavenging Layers Enabling Lithium-Sulfur Batteries with High Energy Density and Prolonged Cycling Life.

ACS nano·2017
Same author

PdAuCu Nanobranch as Self-Repairing Electrocatalyst for Oxygen Reduction Reaction.

ChemSusChem·2017
Same author

Trapdoor spiders of the genus <i>Cyclocosmia</i> Ausserer, 1871 from China and Vietnam (Araneae, Ctenizidae).

ZooKeys·2017
Same author

The complete genome sequence, occurrence and host range of Tomato mottle mosaic virus Chinese isolate.

Virology journal·2017
Same author

Tunneling nanotubes promote intercellular mitochondria transfer followed by increased invasiveness in bladder cancer cells.

Oncotarget·2017
Same author

Assessment of histopathological features of needle biopsy in recurrent prostate cancer following salvage high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada·2017

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K

Designing Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trials With a Baseline Measurement of the Outcome.

Kendra Davis-Plourde1,2, Keith Goldfeld3, Heather Allore1,4

  • 1Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.

Statistics in Medicine
|September 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces methods for stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) that include baseline outcome measurements. These methods improve sample size calculations for more efficient trial design in implementation research.

Keywords:
baseline adjustmentcross‐sectional designintracluster correlation coefficientlinear mixed modelpower calculationrelative efficiency

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
04:24

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Published on: April 19, 2019

12.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Propensity Score using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

15.1K
Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment
08:36

Author Spotlight: Evaluating the Adjuvant Efficacy and Safety of Angong Niuhuang Pill in Viral Encephalitis Treatment

Published on: April 19, 2024

1.1K
A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program
04:24

A Novel Digital Platform for a Monitored Home-based Cardiac Rehabilitation Program

Published on: April 19, 2019

12.3K

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trials Methodology
  • Public Health Research

Background:

  • Stepped wedge cluster randomized trials (SW-CRTs) are increasingly utilized in implementation and prevention research.
  • Existing sample size formulas for SW-CRTs often do not account for baseline outcome measurements.
  • Baseline outcome data is common in randomized trials and cross-sectional SW-CRTs.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate methods for incorporating baseline outcome measurements in the design of cross-sectional SW-CRTs.
  • To develop and compare different statistical approaches for adjusting for baseline outcomes.
  • To provide guidance on sample size calculations for SW-CRTs with baseline data.

Main Methods:

  • Three linear mixed modeling approaches were developed to adjust for baseline outcome measurements.
  • Variance formulas for the treatment effect estimator were derived for each approach.
  • Simulation studies were used to validate power and sample size methods.

Main Results:

  • The derived formulas highlight the efficiency gains from including baseline outcome measurements.
  • Comparisons across adjustment approaches offer practical recommendations for trial design.
  • Validated methods facilitate accurate sample size calculations for SW-CRTs with baseline data.

Conclusions:

  • Incorporating baseline outcome measurements in SW-CRTs can enhance statistical efficiency.
  • The proposed modeling approaches and sample size calculations provide valuable tools for researchers.
  • This work supports more robust and efficient trial designs in public health and implementation science.