Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
Published on: December 9, 2022
Jointly Extracting Interventions, Outcomes, and Findings from RCT Reports with LLMs
Somin Wadhwa1, Jay DeYoung1, Benjamin Nye2
1Khoury College of Computer Sciences, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
This study introduces a new AI model using Large Language Models (LLMs) to automatically extract key information like interventions, outcomes, and comparators from clinical trial reports, improving evidence-based care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Informatics
- Natural Language Processing
- Clinical Trial Analysis
Background:
- Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) are crucial for determining intervention effectiveness and informing evidence-based care.
- Extracting structured data from unstructured clinical trial reports is a manual, time-consuming process for clinicians.
- Automating the extraction of key trial elements is essential for efficient evidence synthesis.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and evaluate a text-to-text model using instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated extraction of Interventions, Outcomes, and Comparators (ICO elements) from clinical abstracts.
- To infer associated results reported in clinical trial articles.
- To improve the efficiency and accuracy of evidence extraction from scientific literature.
Main Methods:
- Utilized instruction-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) to build a text-to-text model for joint extraction of ICO elements and associated results.
- Framed evidence extraction as a conditional generation task.
- Conducted manual (expert) and automated evaluations to assess model performance against previous state-of-the-art (SOTA).
Main Results:
- The proposed LLM-based model achieved significant improvements, with approximately a 20-point absolute F1 score increase over the previous SOTA.
- Evaluations demonstrated the effectiveness of framing evidence extraction as a conditional generation task for fine-tuning LLMs.
- Ablation studies and error analyses were performed to understand model performance drivers and identify areas for future enhancement.
Conclusions:
- The developed LLM-based approach substantially enhances the automated extraction of structured evidence from clinical trial abstracts.
- This method offers a more efficient and accurate way to synthesize findings from RCTs, supporting evidence-based medicine.
- A searchable database of structured findings from RCTs up to mid-2022 has been created and released to facilitate access to synthesized trial results.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Longitudinal Research
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

