Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.4K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.4K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

1.8K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
1.8K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.3K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.3K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

99.8K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
99.8K
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

1.1K
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
1.1K
Improving Translational Accuracy02:07

Improving Translational Accuracy

14.1K
Base complementarity between the three base pairs of mRNA codon and the tRNA anticodon is not a failsafe mechanism. Inaccuracies can range from a single mismatch to no correct base pairing at all. The free energy difference between the correct and nearly correct base pairs can be as small as 3 kcal/ mol. With complementarity being the only proofreading step, the estimated error frequency would be one wrong amino acid in every 100 amino acids incorporated. However, error frequencies observed in...
14.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Fast evaluation of unbiased atomic forces in ab initio variational Monte Carlo via the Lagrangian technique.

The Journal of chemical physics·2026
Same author

Structure and dynamics of sulfur vacancies in monolayer MoS2 studied by DFT-based machine learning potentials.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Load-balanced diffusion Monte Carlo method with lattice regularization.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Reproducibility of fixed-node diffusion Monte Carlo across diverse community codes: The case of water-methane dimer.

The Journal of chemical physics·2025
Same author

Basis Set Incompleteness Errors in Fixed-Node Diffusion Monte Carlo Calculations on Noncovalent Interactions.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2025
Same author

Synthesis of Machine Learning-Predicted Cs<sub>2</sub>PbSnI<sub>6</sub> Double Perovskite Nanocrystals.

ACS nano·2025
Same journal

Nuclear Gradients from Auxiliary-Field Quantum Monte Carlo and Their Applications in ML-Driven Geometry Optimization and Transition State Search.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Correction to "Cluster-in-Molecule Local Correlation Method with an Accurate Distant Pair Correction for Large Systems".

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Machine-Learned Force Fields for Lattice Dynamics at Coupled-Cluster Level Accuracy.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Systematic Molecularity-Dependent Entropy Errors in Continuum/RRHO Solution Thermochemistry: Origin and Correction.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

After 100 Years of Quantum Mechanics: Toward a Constructive Observation-Centered Perspective.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
Same journal

Sample-Based Quantum Diagonalization Methods for Modeling the Photochemistry of Diazirine and Diazo Compounds.

Journal of chemical theory and computation·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K

Self-Consistency Error Correction for Accurate Machine Learning Potentials from Variational Monte Carlo.

Giacomo Tenti1, Kousuke Nakano2,3, Michele Casula4

  • 1International School for Advanced Studies (SISSA), Via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy.

Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
|September 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Self-consistency error (SCE) in Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) training data can harm machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs). Correcting this bias significantly improves MLIP accuracy for molecular dynamics simulations.

More Related Videos

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception
05:48

Author Spotlight: Investigating the Impact of Emotional Prosodies on Voice Recognition and Perception

Published on: August 9, 2024

2.0K
Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine
07:05

Visualization Method for Proprioceptive Drift on a 2D Plane Using Support Vector Machine

Published on: October 27, 2016

9.6K
A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments
08:12

A Psychophysics Paradigm for the Collection and Analysis of Similarity Judgments

Published on: March 1, 2022

2.9K

Area of Science:

  • Computational materials science
  • Quantum chemistry
  • Machine learning

Background:

  • Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) is a powerful method for training machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs).
  • VMC training sets often use partially optimized wave functions (WFs) to reduce computational cost.
  • Frozen variational parameters in WFs introduce a self-consistency error (SCE), biasing forces and pressures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the detrimental impact of SCE on MLIP accuracy.
  • To apply a novel SCE correction method to VMC training data.
  • To improve the reliability of MLIPs for molecular dynamics (MD) simulations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing VMC to generate training data for MLIPs.
  • Implementing an SCE correction for VMC wave functions with frozen Kohn-Sham orbitals.
  • Training MLIPs on both uncorrected and SCE-corrected VMC data.
  • Performing MD simulations to evaluate MLIP performance and physical observables.

Main Results:

  • The self-consistency error (SCE) was shown to negatively impact MLIP accuracy, using high-pressure hydrogen as a test case.
  • Applying the SCE correction to VMC training sets significantly improved MLIP quality.
  • MLIPs trained on SCE-corrected data approached the accuracy of those trained on fully optimized WFs.
  • MD simulations confirmed that SCE-corrected MLIPs yield more reliable physical observables.

Conclusions:

  • The developed framework effectively corrects the self-consistency error in VMC training data.
  • This correction enables the generation of high-quality MLIPs suitable for accurate MD simulations.
  • The approach facilitates the creation of larger, more reliable VMC-based training datasets.