Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Probe Type II Band Alignment in One-Dimensional Van Der Waals Heterostructures Using First-Principles Calculations
Published on: October 12, 2019
1D transition metal oxide chains as a challenging model for ab initio calculations
Jila Amini1, Mojtaba Alaei1,2, Stefano de Gironcoli3,4
1Department of Physics, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran.
Abstract:
Providing highly simplified models of strongly correlated electronic systems that challenge ab initio calculations can serve as a valuable testing ground to improve these methods. In this study, we present a comprehensive investigation of the structural, magnetic, and electronic properties of one-dimensional transition metal mono-oxide chains (VO, CrO, MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO) using density functional theory (DFT), DFT+U, and coupled-cluster singles and doubles (CCSD) calculations. The Hubbard U parameter for DFT+U is determined using linear response theory. In all systems studied except MnO, the presence of multiple local minima-primarily due to the electronic degrees of freedom associated with the d-orbitals-leads to significant challenges for DFT, DFT+U, and Hartree-Fock methods in finding the global minimum in ab initio calculations. Our results indicate that the antiferromagnetic (AFM) state is energetically favored for all chains, except CrO, when using DFT+U and the Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof (PBE) functional. Analysis of the band structures shows that while PBE often predicts metallic or half-metallic FM states, DFT+U opens band gaps and correctly yields insulating behavior in all cases. Furthermore, we compared the energy differences between the AFM and FM states using DFT+U and CCSD for CrO, MnO, FeO, CoO, and NiO. Our findings indicate that CCSD predicts larger energy differences in some cases compared to DFT+U, suggesting that the Hubbard U parameter obtained through linear response theory may be overestimated when used to calculate energy differences between different magnetic states. For CrO, CCSD predicts an AFM ground state, in contrast to the predictions from DFT+U and PBE methods.
Related Concept Videos
Properties of Transition Metals
Crystal Field Theory - Octahedral Complexes
To explain the observed behavior of transition metal complexes (such as colors), a model involving electrostatic interactions between the electrons from the ligands and the electrons in the unhybridized d orbitals of the central metal atom has been developed. This electrostatic model is crystal field theory (CFT). It helps to understand, interpret, and predict the colors, magnetic behavior, and some structures of coordination compounds of transition metals.
CFT focuses on...
Metallic Solids
All metallic solids exhibit high thermal and electrical conductivity, metallic luster, and malleability....
Valence Bond Theory
Periodic Classification of the Elements
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...

