Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Natural Selection and Adaptation01:15

Natural Selection and Adaptation

1.2K
Natural selection, a fundamental concept in evolutionary biology, is the mechanism by which evolution is driven, favoring organisms that are best adapted to their environments. This process enhances their chances of survival and reproduction. Adaptation, a key outcome of this process, involves genetic modifications that optimize an organism's functionality under specific environmental challenges, such as extreme cold or thinner air at high altitudes.
Beyond physical adaptations,...
1.2K
Limits to Natural Selection01:38

Limits to Natural Selection

34.0K
Organisms that are well-adapted to their environment are more likely to survive and reproduce. However, natural selection does not lead to perfectly adapted organisms. Several factors constrain natural selection.
34.0K
Evolutionary Psychology01:20

Evolutionary Psychology

939
Evolutionary psychology explores the origins of human behavior and mental processes by framing them within the context of natural selection, a theory famously propounded by Charles Darwin. This field asserts that many behaviors common across human societies — ranging from instinctive fear reactions to complex social interactions — arose as evolutionary adaptations. These adaptations enhanced the survival and reproductive success of our ancestors, thereby becoming embedded in the...
939
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

6.9K
Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
6.9K
The Evidence for Evolution02:55

The Evidence for Evolution

47.6K
Genetic variations accumulating within populations over generations give rise to biological evolution. Evolutionary changes can result in the formation of novel varieties and entire new species. These changes are responsible for the diverse forms of life inhabiting the planet. The evidence for evolution suggests that all living organisms descended from common ancestors.
47.6K
Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss01:57

Adaptations that Reduce Water Loss

27.9K
Though evaporation from plant leaves drives transpiration, it also results in loss of water. Because water is critical for photosynthetic reactions and other cellular processes, evolutionary pressures on plants in different environments have driven the acquisition of adaptations that reduce water loss.
27.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Regulatory logic and transposable element dynamics in Caenorhabditis genomes.

Genome biology and evolution·2026
Same author

"Let's Dry up and Survive Together": Is Anhydrobiosis in Two <i>Paramacrobiotus</i> Species (Tardigrada) Associated with a Specific Microbiome Community?

International journal of molecular sciences·2026
Same author

Chromosome Scale Assembly of Novel <i>Caenorhabditis</i> species #65 (JU4118).

Research square·2026
Same author

Chromosome Scale Assembly of Novel <i>Caenorhabditis</i> species #61 (JU4110).

Research square·2026
Same author

A compendium of horizontal gene transfers in Metazoa.

Scientific data·2026
Same author

The nature and prevalence of diversification rate shifts across the Tree of Life.

Evolution letters·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.6K

Phylogenetic comparative methods for studying adaptation: the adaptation-inertia framework.

Jason Pienaar1, Krzysztof Bartoszek2, Bayu Brahmantio2

  • 1The Institute of Environment and the Biomolecular Sciences Institute, Florida International University, Miami, United States.

Journal of Evolutionary Biology
|September 24, 2025
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Phylogenetic comparative methods using the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process model evolving adaptive landscapes for macroevolutionary studies. These advanced techniques offer realistic insights into long-term trait evolution and coevolutionary dynamics.

Keywords:
AdaptationAdaptive LandscapeMacroevolutionOrnstein-Uhlenbeck ProcessPhylogenetic Comparative MethodsPhylogenetic Inertia

More Related Videos

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

19.4K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Visualizing Visual Adaptation
04:43

Visualizing Visual Adaptation

Published on: April 24, 2017

9.6K
Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications
07:37

Resurrection of Dormant Daphnia magna: Protocol and Applications

Published on: January 19, 2018

19.4K
A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

36.0K

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Macroevolutionary Studies
  • Phylogenetics

Background:

  • Phylogenetic comparative methods are crucial for testing macroevolutionary hypotheses.
  • The Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process models adaptation on a dynamic phenotypic landscape.
  • Fitness peaks in OU models are influenced by environmental factors and organismal traits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide an overview of the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process for modeling adaptive landscapes.
  • To discuss the interpretation of parameters within these phylogenetic comparative methods.
  • To highlight the advantages of modeling changing adaptive landscapes for understanding long-term evolution.

Main Methods:

  • Overview of Ornstein-Uhlenbeck (OU) process implementations.
  • Discussion of multivariate extensions for complex evolutionary hypotheses.
  • Guidance on interpreting recent literature in biological terms.

Main Results:

  • OU process models allow for adaptation on evolving phenotypic landscapes.
  • Changing adaptive landscapes offer a more realistic view of long-term trait evolution.
  • Multivariate extensions enhance hypothesis testing but require careful interpretation.

Conclusions:

  • OU-based phylogenetic comparative methods are powerful tools for macroevolutionary research.
  • These methods provide a foundation for modeling reciprocal selection and coevolution.
  • Future developments are needed to further enhance their utility for evolutionary biologists.