Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026
Author Spotlight: Advancing Cardiovascular Research — Tailored Langendorff Perfusion Techniques for Improved Experimental Outcomes
Published on: June 14, 2024
Prospective observational study comparing systemic inflammatory responses across different perfusion systems during
Kaan Kırali1,2, Sibel Aydın2, Ayhan Güneş1
1Department of Cardiovascular Surgery of Koşuyolu High Specialization Education and Research Hospital, Turkey.
Objectives:
Minimal Invasive Extracorporeal Circulation (MiECC) and Hybrid System (HS) have been introduced to potentially reduce this inflammatory response compared to conventional Cardiopulmonary Bypass (cCPB). The hybrid system combines elements of conventional and minimized circuits, including a collapsible reservoir, integrated arterial filter, and hypobaric oxygenator, allowing rapid conversion and air embolism control.This study aims to provide a comparative analysis of biomarkers of systemic inflammatory response induced by MiECC, HS and cCPB systems in isolated CABG patients.
Methods:
In this prospective pilot observational study a total of 66 patients who underwent isolated on-pump CABG performed under aortic cross-clamp enrolled. in this single-center, prospective pilot study. Systemic inflammatory markers (IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, TNF-α, LE, HIF-1α) and oxidative status were measured at five intervals: preoperative (pre-pump), intraoperative (on-pump), and at 6, 12, and 24 hours postoperatively (post-pump).
Results:
A total of 66 patients were enrolled: MiECC (n = 20), Hybrid System (HS, n = 22), and cCPB (n = 24). Notably, 2 patients initially assigned to MiECC required intraoperative conversion to cCPB due to haemodynamic instability. Both MiECC and HS groups consistently showed lower levels of systemic inflammatory biomarkers and oxidative stress indicators at all intraoperative and postoperative time points compared to cCPB. For instance, IL-6 levels at 6 hours post-op were 292 pg/mL in MiECC, 311 pg/mL in HS, and 514 pg/mL in cCPB; Oxidative Stress Index values at the same time point were 70 in MiECC, 66 in HS, and 142 in cCPB. Hemoglobin decline was least pronounced in the MiECC group, and red blood cell transfusion was required in 50% of cCPB patients, compared to 10% in MiECC and 13.6% in HS. HIF-1α levels were higher in HS than MiECC at 12 hours post-op (3.8 vs 2.6 ng/mL). No substantial differences were observed between groups in troponin, creatinine, or lactate values.
Conclusions:
MiECC and HS show a similar profile in alleviating systemic inflammation, with notable reductions in inflammatory biomarkers and key clinical oxidative outcomes compared with cCPB. These results underscore the potential of MiECC and HS to improve clinical recovery by minimizing the inflammatory effect in on-pump CABG procedures.
