Differential results of genetic risk scoring for multiple sclerosis in European and African American populations
Cyprien A Rivier1, Leqi Xu2, Santiago Clocchiatti-Tuozzo1
1Department of Neurology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Yale Center for Brain and Mind Health, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
Background:
Genetic risk scores (GRSs) for multiple sclerosis (MS) help identify high-risk individuals and stratify populations for clinical trials, but most are derived from European populations, raising questions about GRS accuracy in other ancestries.
Objectives:
We aimed to determine whether an MS GRS can stratify individuals of African and Latino/admixed ancestry and assess whether the JointPRS tool enhances GRS portability in African ancestry.
Methods:
In this cross-sectional study using All of Us (2018-2022), we derived a GRS from 232 variants for 32,428 European, 32,428 African, and 32,428 Latino/admixed participants, each divided into quintiles. The outcome was MS ascertained through International Classification of Diseases (ICD)-9/10 and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine (SNOMED) codes. JointPRS was used to improve GRS portability in the African-ancestry group.
Results:
MS prevalence was 1.0% in European, 0.56% in African, and 0.46% in Latino/admixed participants. The GRS stratified MS risk effectively in European (odds ratio (OR) = 2.30 (1.60-3.36); p-trend < 0.001) and Latino/admixed (OR = 2.53 (1.43-4.85); p-trend < 0.001) ancestry groups but did not significantly partition African participants (OR = 1.30 (0.88-1.95); p-trend = 0.17). After applying JointPRS, stratification in African ancestry improved (OR = 3.02 (1.00-8.95); p-trend = 0.007).
Discussion:
A GRS for MS stratified European and Latino/admixed individuals but not African ancestry. Incorporating African-specific data enhanced performance, underscoring the need for more ancestry-tailored GRS.
More Related Videos
11:35Screening for Functional Non-coding Genetic Variants Using Electrophoretic Mobility Shift Assay EMSA and DNA-affinity Precipitation Assay DAPA
Published on: August 21, 2016
05:53Candidate Gene Testing in Clinical Cohort Studies with Multiplexed Genotyping and Mass Spectrometry
Published on: June 21, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Human Genetics
The complex relationship between genetics and psychology is observable through common biological components such...
