Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Handwriting Analysis Indicates Spontaneous Dyskinesias in Neuroleptic Naïve Adolescents at High Risk for Psychosis
Published on: November 21, 2013
Exploring risk and protective factors which distinguish suicidal and self-harm behaviours from suicidal and self-harm
Marianne E Etherson1, Sieun Lee2,3, Krystyna J Loney1
1Suicidal Behaviour Research Lab, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Background:
Self-harm and suicidal thoughts and behaviours among young people are significant global public health concerns. Although most young people with thoughts of self-harm or suicide do not act on their thoughts, it is important to identify factors that distinguish thoughts of self-harm and suicide from behaviours. To date, there are no reviews distinguishing self-harm and suicidal behaviours from thoughts of self-harm and suicide in young people or that have synthesised factors distinguishing self-harm behaviours from self-harm ideation. The current review addresses these gaps in the literature.
Methods:
We systematically searched: CINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO, Psychology and Behavioural Sciences Collection, and Web of Science Core Collection for articles published between 2011 and April 2024. Ninety-nine studies met inclusion criteria, with 92 articles examining risk and protective factors that distinguished suicide attempts from suicidal ideation and seven articles examining factors that distinguished self-harm behaviours from self-harm ideation. Using a narrative synthesis approach, studies were grouped by their outcome variable (e.g., self-harm or suicide) and then by risk and protective factors.
Results:
While findings were inconsistent, the presence of non-suicidal self-injury, physical, emotional, or sexual abuse, violence, and family factors (e.g., family conflict) distinguished suicidal attempts from suicidal ideation. By contrast, the presence of parental factors (e.g., parental connectedness) and greater academic achievement were protective and distinguished suicidal ideation from suicide attempts. Being female, exposure to self-harm/suicide, and impulsivity distinguished self-harm behaviours from self-harm ideation. There was no evidence of protective factors that distinguished self-harm behaviours from self-harm ideation.
Conclusions:
The current review highlights important risk and protective factors that distinguish suicidal and self-harm behaviours from suicidal and self-harm ideation in young people. Our review has important implications for intervention and prevention efforts as identifying key risk and protective factors can improve risk assessment for young people experiencing thoughts of self-harm and suicide and enable more targeted interventions.
More Related Videos
07:31Implementation of a Real-Time Psychosis Risk Detection and Alerting System Based on Electronic Health Records using CogStack
Published on: May 15, 2020
08:42Design and Implementation of an fMRI Study Examining Thought Suppression in Young Women with, and At-risk, for Depression
Published on: May 19, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Bullying
Psychological and Sociocultural Causes of Schizophrenia
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Influence of Parents and Peers on Identity
Parental Influence on Identity Development
Parents serve as primary guides and managers in an adolescent's life, offering support instrumental in decision-making and personal growth....