Causal factors for migraine in Mendelian randomization studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xinyao Li1, Qingming Liu1, Huitong Ni1

  • 1West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

Frontiers in Neurology
|September 25, 2025
PubMed
Abstract

Insights

This study used Mendelian randomization to find bidirectional causal links between migraine and many conditions, including diseases, lifestyle factors, and physiological markers. It highlights distinct pathways for migraine with and without aura, informing precision medicine.

Area of Science:

  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Neurology

Background:

  • Migraine is a complex neurological disorder with unclear causal factors.
  • Observational studies have limitations in establishing causality.
  • Mendelian randomization (MR) offers a robust method to infer causal relationships using genetic variants.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze MR evidence on bidirectional causal relationships between migraine and systemic diseases.
  • To identify novel risk determinants for migraine.
  • To highlight gaps for future mechanistic investigations into migraine pathogenesis.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive literature search across seven databases up to July 3, 2024.
  • Independent assessment of study eligibility and data extraction adhering to STROBE-MR guidelines.
  • Meta-analysis of effect estimates and subgroup analyses for migraine with aura (MWA) and migraine without aura (MOA).

Main Results:

  • Identified bidirectional causal relationships between migraine and numerous phenotypes.
  • Migraine causally linked to 6 diseases, 3 behavioral habits, 1 dietary intake, and 3 physiological indicators.
  • Found 6 diseases, 5 behavioral factors, 4 dietary determinants, 13 physiological parameters, and 1 gut microbe to be causal determinants of migraine risk.

Conclusions:

  • Robust genetic evidence supports bidirectional causal links between migraine and various systemic diseases, lifestyle, and physiological factors.
  • Subtype-specific analyses reveal distinct causal pathways for MOA and MWA, indicating migraine's clinical heterogeneity.
  • Findings advance understanding of migraine pathogenesis, inform precision medicine, and identify potential therapeutic targets.

Related Concept Videos

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II01:28

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II

The Bradford Hill criteria serve as guidelines for establishing causative links in epidemiological research. Beyond Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality, key criteria also include Biological Gradient, Plausibility, Coherence, Experiment, and Analogy. These principles assist scientists in assessing the likelihood of causation in complex biological contexts. Below is a summary of these concepts:
1.1K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.5K
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I01:30

Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I

The Bradford Hill criteria are a group of principles that provide a framework to determine a causal relationship between a specific factor and a disease. There are nine criteria that are pivotal in assessing causality in epidemiological studies. Here's a closer look at Strength, Consistency, Specificity, and Temporality criteria with definitions and examples:
1.0K
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS01:11

Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS

Genome-wide association studies or GWAS are used to identify whether common SNPs are associated with certain diseases. Suppose specific SNPs are more frequently observed in individuals with a particular disease than those without the disease. In that case, those SNPs are said to be associated with the disease. Chi-square analysis is performed to check the probability of the allele likely to be associated with the disease.
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
15.3K
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.3K
Mismatch Repair01:20

Mismatch Repair

Organisms are capable of detecting and fixing nucleotide mismatches that occur during DNA replication. This sophisticated process requires identifying the new strand and replacing the erroneous bases with correct nucleotides. Mismatch repair is coordinated by many proteins in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes.
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
6.3K