Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 6, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Impact of visually identified in-stent protrusion on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment
Taku Kasahara1, Kenichi Sakakura2, Hiroyuki Jinnouchi1
1Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Saitama Medical Center, Jichi Medical University, 1-847 Amanuma, Omiya, Saitama City, 330-8503, Japan.
Insights
Angiographically visible in-stent protrusions after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treatment are linked to worse clinical outcomes. This finding suggests that these defects may require additional intervention or closer patient monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
Background:
- In-stent protrusion can occur after stent implantation for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
- The clinical significance of non-obstructive in-stent protrusions remains uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical outcomes in STEMI patients with and without angiographically visible in-stent protrusions.
- To assess the association between in-stent protrusions and long-term adverse cardiovascular events.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of 639 STEMI patients undergoing stent implantation.
- Patients divided into protrusion (n=59) and clear stent (n=580) groups.
- Primary endpoint: major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization.
Main Results:
- The protrusion group experienced significantly more MACE than the clear stent group (p=0.002).
- In-stent protrusion was an independent predictor of MACE (HR 2.373, p=0.004).
Conclusions:
- Angiographically visible in-stent contrast defects predict poorer clinical outcomes in primary PCI for STEMI.
- Consideration of additional intervention or careful follow-up is warranted for STEMI patients with in-stent protrusions.
Abstract:
In-stent protrusion is sometimes observed after the stent implantation to the culprit lesion of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, it remains unclear whether additional interventions are necessary for non-obstructive in-stent protrusions. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare clinical outcomes of patients with STEMI between with and without angiographically visible in-stent protrusions, and to evaluate the association between angiographically visible in-stent protrusions and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI. We included 639 patients with STEMI who underwent stent implantation and divided them into the protrusion group (n = 59) and the clear stent group (n = 580). In-stent protrusion was defined as an angiographically visible in-stent contrast filling defect at final angiography. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which were defined as the composite of all cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization. During the median follow-up duration of 620 (213-1379) days, MACE were more frequently observed in the protrusion group than in the clear stent group (p = 0.002). The multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that in-stent protrusion was significantly associated with MACE after controlling for multiple confounding factors (HR 2.373, 95% CI 1.311-4.294, p = 0.004). In conclusion, angiographically visible in-stent contrast filling defect at final angiography is a marker for worse clinical outcomes in primary PCI. When interventional cardiologists recognize visible irregular protrusion after stent implantation for STEMI, additional intervention or careful clinical follow up may be needed.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Coronary Syndrome I: Introduction
Endocarditis III: Medical Management

