M3C: Resist Agnostic Attacks by Mitigating Consistent Class Confusion Prior
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
Abstract:
Adversarial attack is a major obstacle to the deployment of deep neural networks (DNNs) for security-sensitive applications. To address these adversarial perturbations, various adversarial defense strategies have been developed, with Adversarial Training (AT) being one of the most effective methods to protect neural networks from adversarial attacks. However, existing AT methods struggle against training-agnostic attacks due to their limited generalizability. This suggests that the AT models lack a unified perspective for various attacks to conduct universal defense. This paper sheds light on a generalizable prior under various attacks: consistent class confusion (3C), i.e., an AT classifier often confuses the predictions between correct and ambiguous classes in a highly similar pattern among diverse attacks. Relying on this latent prior as a bridge between seen and agnostic attacks, we propose a more generalized AT model by mitigating consistent class confusion (M3C) to resist training-agnostic attacks. Specifically, we optimize an Adversarial Confusion Loss (ACL), which is weighted by uncertainty, to distinguish the most confused classes and encourage the AT model to focus on these confused samples. To suppress malignant features affecting correct predictions and producing significant class confusion, we propose a Gradient-Aware Attention (GAA) mechanism to enhance the classification confidence of correct classes and eliminate class confusion. Experiments on multiple benchmarks and network frameworks demonstrate that our M3C model significantly improves the generalization of AT robustness against agnostic attacks. The finding of the 3C prior reveals the potential and possibility for defending against a wide range of attacks, and provides a new perspective to overcome such challenge in this field.
Related Concept Videos
Mismatch Repair
The Mutator Protein Family Plays a Key Role in DNA Mismatch Repair
The human genome has more than 3 billion base pairs of DNA per cell. Prior to cell division, that vast amount of genetic...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Conservative Site-specific Recombination and Phase Variation
The recognition sites for Cre recombinase called LoxP...
Cognitive Dissonance
Masking and Demasking Agents
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...

