PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events in a large clinical trial: findings from the phase 3 POLARIX study

Carrie Thompson1, Marek Trněný2, Franck Morschhauser3

  • 1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.

Blood
|September 25, 2025
PubMed

Insights

The POLARIX study found polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHOP improved quality of life in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients compared to R-CHOP. Patient-reported outcomes highlighted symptom experiences, complementing clinician data.

Area of Science:

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background:

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presents complex challenges regarding symptom variability and treatment impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
  • The phase 3 POLARIX study previously established superior progression-free survival (PFS) for polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHOP (Pola-R-CHP) versus R-CHOP in untreated DLBCL.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in the POLARIX study.
  • To characterize the patient experience and compare PROs with clinician-reported adverse events (AEs).

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms using PRO instruments.
  • Comparison of patient-reported symptoms with clinician-reported AEs in 874 evaluable patients.

Main Results:

  • A notable discordance was observed between PROs and clinician-reported AEs, with patients reporting higher symptom incidence.
  • Both Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP demonstrated rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms.
  • Gastrointestinal symptoms were similar between arms and resolved post-treatment; improvements were noted in global health status, fatigue, and functioning.

Conclusions:

  • Patient-reported outcomes are crucial for a comprehensive assessment of treatment efficacy and tolerability, complementing clinician-reported data.
  • Pola-R-CHP may establish a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL, enhancing the patient experience.

Related Concept Videos

Clinical Trials01:16

Clinical Trials

Clinical trials are prospective experimental studies conducted on humans to determine the safety and efficacy of treatments, drugs, diet methods, and medical devices. Using statistics in clinical trials enables researchers to derive reasonable and accurate conclusions from the collected data, allowing them to make wise decisions in uncertain situations. In medical research, statistical methods are crucial for preventing errors and bias.
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
10.1K
Clinical Trials: Overview01:11

Clinical Trials: Overview

Clinical development focuses on how the drug will interact with the human body and encompasses four key phases of clinical trials, each serving a specific purpose in assessing the safety and effectiveness of new drugs. These phases overlap and build upon one another. Phase I involves a small group of healthy volunteers (typically 20-80 individuals) or, in cases where significant toxicity is expected, patients with the targeted disease, such as cancer or AIDS. The volunteers are tested for...
4.6K
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches01:23

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
407
Pharmacovigilance01:19

Pharmacovigilance

Post-marketing surveillance is a critical component of pharmaceutical regulation, often uncovering unanticipated adverse drug reactions (ADRs) once a drug is widely used over an extended period.
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
1.6K
Hazard Ratio01:12

Hazard Ratio

The hazard ratio (HR) is a widely used measure in clinical trials to compare the risk of events, such as death or disease recurrence, between two groups over time. It reflects the ratio of hazard rates—the instantaneous risk of the event occurring—between a treatment group and a control group. This measure provides valuable insights into the relative effectiveness of a treatment by assessing how the risk of an event differs between the two groups.
For example, in a clinical trial...
561
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients01:15

Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

Bioavailability studies are essential for evaluating a drug's therapeutic efficacy and understanding its absorption patterns under various physiological conditions. Conducting such studies on target patient populations provides more relevant data by simulating real-world disease states. However, practical challenges often necessitate the use of young, healthy adult volunteers as study subjects.Patients may exhibit altered drug absorption patterns due to the effects of the disease itself,...
144