Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 17, 2026

A Clinical Trial Assessing the Safety, Efficacy, and Delivery of Olive-Oil-Based Three-Chamber Bags for Parenteral Nutrition
Published on: September 20, 2019
PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events in a large clinical trial: findings from the phase 3 POLARIX study
Carrie Thompson1, Marek Trněný2, Franck Morschhauser3
1Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN.
Insights
The POLARIX study found polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHOP improved quality of life in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients compared to R-CHOP. Patient-reported outcomes highlighted symptom experiences, complementing clinician data.
Area of Science:
- Hematology
- Oncology
- Patient-Reported Outcomes
Background:
- Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) presents complex challenges regarding symptom variability and treatment impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL).
- The phase 3 POLARIX study previously established superior progression-free survival (PFS) for polatuzumab vedotin plus R-CHOP (Pola-R-CHP) versus R-CHOP in untreated DLBCL.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) using patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments in the POLARIX study.
- To characterize the patient experience and compare PROs with clinician-reported adverse events (AEs).
Main Methods:
- Analysis of changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms using PRO instruments.
- Comparison of patient-reported symptoms with clinician-reported AEs in 874 evaluable patients.
Main Results:
- A notable discordance was observed between PROs and clinician-reported AEs, with patients reporting higher symptom incidence.
- Both Pola-R-CHP and R-CHOP demonstrated rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms.
- Gastrointestinal symptoms were similar between arms and resolved post-treatment; improvements were noted in global health status, fatigue, and functioning.
Conclusions:
- Patient-reported outcomes are crucial for a comprehensive assessment of treatment efficacy and tolerability, complementing clinician-reported data.
- Pola-R-CHP may establish a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL, enhancing the patient experience.
Abstract:
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) poses a challenge in hematology given its varied symptoms, and the complex interplay between disease and treatment effects on health-related quality of life (HRQoL). The phase 3 POLARIX study demonstrated superior progression-free survival and a similar safety profile with polatuzumab vedotin plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (Pola-R-CHP) vs R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone) in patients with previously untreated DLBCL. Here, we evaluate HRQoL through patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments to fully characterize the patient experience in the POLARIX study. Changes from baseline in HRQoL, lymphoma symptoms, and gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms were assessed, as well as incidence and severity of common symptoms by PROs vs clinician-reported adverse events (AEs). Baseline characteristics of PRO-evaluable patients (N = 874) were consistent. Comparison between PROs and clinician-reported AEs revealed a notable discordance; patients generally reported a higher incidence of symptoms than clinicians, emphasizing the need for patient-centric tools to accurately capture the patient experience. Both treatments exhibited rapid and sustained improvements in HRQoL and lymphoma symptoms, with the most substantial improvements seen in global health status/QoL, lymphoma symptoms, fatigue, role, emotional, and social functioning. GI symptoms (diarrhea, constipation, nausea, and vomiting) were generally similar between treatment arms and returned to baseline levels after treatment completion. These HRQoL data underscore the complementarity of PROs, as an adjunct to clinician-reported AEs, in evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of new treatments, including Pola-R-CHP, which may represent a new benchmark for patient-reported HRQoL in previously untreated DLBCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03274492.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Hazard Ratio
For example, in a clinical trial...
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients

