Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

05:22
Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
Published on: August 11, 2023
2.8K
Endoscopic simulators in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical training: a scoping review
Nicolas Siron1,2, Othmane Zekraoui3, Marie-Lyssa Lafontaine3
1Division of Urology, University of Montreal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada. ns.siron@gmail.com.
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
|September 25, 2025
Summary
This scoping review highlights the need for diverse simulation-based training (SBT) models for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgeries beyond transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Future BPH surgical simulators require validation for integration into training curricula.
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Surgical Simulation
- Urology
Background:
- Simulation-based training (SBT) is crucial for developing surgical skills in a risk-free environment.
- The rise of new endoscopic therapies for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) necessitates updated learning tools.
- This review outlines available endoscopic BPH simulators.
Purpose of the Study:
- To provide a comprehensive and updated overview of existing endoscopic simulators for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) surgery.
- To identify and categorize simulators based on the surgical procedure they represent.
- To assess data on simulator validity, acceptability, and feasibility.
Main Methods:
- A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute methodology.
- Searches of major databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL) and Google Scholar were performed.
- Included studies were original articles on endoscopic BPH surgery simulators, with data extraction on validity, acceptability, and feasibility.
Main Results:
- Forty-five records were analyzed, focusing on simulators for transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), GreenLight laser prostatectomy (PVP), anatomic endoscopic enucleation of the prostate (AEEP), and Urolift.
- Various simulator types were identified, including bench-top, virtual reality, food-based phantoms, porcine models, and cadaver prostates.
- Virtual simulation was the sole modality for PVP, ThuLEP, and Urolift simulators.
Conclusions:
- There is a need to develop simulation-based training (SBT) models for BPH surgeries beyond transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).
- Future BPH surgical simulation models should be rigorously evaluated using modern validity metrics.
- Integration of validated simulators into surgical training curricula is recommended.

