Proposal for setting a passing score for the Korean Nursing Licensing Examination

Area of Science:

• Nursing Education
• Psychometrics
• Health Professions Assessment

Background:

• The Korean Nursing Licensing Examination (KNLE) is transitioning to a computer-based test (CBT).
• Establishing reliable passing scores is crucial for maintaining licensure standards during this transition.
• Existing standard-setting methods require evaluation for CBT environments.

Purpose of the Study:

• To propose a reasonable and efficient method for setting passing scores for the KNLE's CBT transition.
• To validate the proposed standard-setting method using expert judgment and statistical analysis.
• To ensure the integrity and fairness of the KNLE passing scores in a new testing format.

Main Methods:

• A modified Angoff method was employed with an expert panel over three years of national nursing examination data.
• The Hofstee method was used to verify the validity of the determined passing scores.
• A two-stage workshop process was implemented, including a pilot and a main workshop, with specific calculations for items exceeding a 90% correct answer rate.

Main Results:

• The newly proposed method resulted in a slightly higher passing score compared to the existing one.
• Nursing subjects showed similar passing score outcomes, while legal subjects exhibited variations.
• Expert panel feedback indicated satisfaction with the standard-setting procedures and outcomes.

Conclusions:

• The modified Angoff and Hofstee methods are suitable for setting KNLE passing scores, especially for CBT.
• Utilizing the actual correct answer rate to estimate minimum competency is an effective approach.
• This methodology offers a streamlined process for future standard-setting, particularly for CBT transitions in professional licensing exams.