Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Aortic and Pulmonary Artery Hemodynamics in a Large Animal Model of ARDS
Published on: November 26, 2018
PaO2/FIO2-Based Stratification Discriminates Treatment Failure in Nonintubated Subjects With ARDS
Masaaki Sakuraya1,2, Kazuma Nagata3, Toshiki Yokoyama4
1Dr. Sakuraya is affiliated with Department of Emergency and Intensive Care Medicine, JA Hiroshima General Hospital, Hatsukaichi, Japan.
Background:
The new global definition of nonintubated subjects with ARDS can be applied to patients receiving high-flow nasal cannula (HFNC), but stratification with PaO2/FIO2 has not been validated. We aimed to investigate the differences in oxygenation assessment between HFNC and CPAP for predicting outcomes.
Methods:
We performed a post hoc analysis of a multi-center randomized controlled trial conducted in Japan, focusing on oxygenation assessments in subjects receiving HFNC or CPAP. Subjects with PaO2/FIO2 < 300 on CPAP at 5 cm H2O were assigned to receive either HFNC or CPAP. Subjects were stratified into mild (PaO2/FIO2 ≥ 200 but <300), moderate (PaO2/FIO2 ≥ 100 but < 200), or severe (PaO2/FIO2 < 100) hypoxemia categories based on oxygenation levels during CPAP at 5 cm H2O. The primary outcome was treatment failure (intubation or in-hospital death). Discriminative performance for treatment failure was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for each device.
Results:
Of the 85 subjects analyzed, 31, 48, and 6 were classified as having mild, moderate, and severe hypoxemia, respectively. Treatment failure occurred more frequently in subjects with moderate and severe hypoxemia than in those with mild hypoxemia (mild 1/31 [3.2%], moderate: 12/48 [25.0%], severe: 3/6 [50.0%], P = .004). Compared with 1 of 38 subjects (2.6%) treated with CPAP, 21 of 47 subjects (44.7%) with HFNC experienced worsened oxygenation even after 30 min of treatment (P < .001). Subjects with HFNC had a lower AUROC of PaO2/FIO2 for treatment failure (0.66, 95% CI 0.54-0.79) than those with CPAP (0.82, 95% CI 0.74-0.90, P = .041).
Conclusions:
PaO2/FIO2-based stratification may help predict treatment failure in patients with nonintubated subjects with ARDS. However, a thorough oxygenation assessment is necessary because of the variability introduced by different respiratory support devices. CPAP might be superior to HFNC when predicting treatment failure.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Respiratory Failure-I
Definition: It is defined by specific criteria based on blood gas measurements. Hypoxemia happens when the partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) falls below 60 mmHg. At the same time,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-II
The underlying physiological abnormalities that contribute to hypoxemic respiratory failure include:
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Oxygen Therapy for Respiratory Failure
Oxygen therapy is vital in increasing and maintaining blood oxygen levels in PAH patients. As a result, it aids in reducing fatigue,...
Acute Respiratory Failure-IV
Acute Respiratory Failure-V
Ensure that patients are monitored continuously for their response to therapy, including changes in...
Acute Respiratory Failure-III

