Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?
Published on: June 6, 2020
Temporal Trends in Second-Stage Cesarean Birth in Ontario, Canada, 2012-2021
Vanessa Hébert1, Sheryll Dimanlig-Cruz1, Giulia M Muraca1
1Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, the Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Department of Medicine, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Objective:
To characterize trends in the mode of delivery in the second stage of labor, to assess factors associated with second-stage cesarean birth compared with operative vaginal birth, and to evaluate the contribution of these factors to changes in second-stage cesarean birth rates over time among individuals giving birth in Ontario, Canada.
Methods:
This was a population-based cohort study of all individuals in Ontario, Canada (2012-2021), with singleton term pregnancies reaching full cervical dilation. Temporal trends were assessed with the Cochran-Armitage test. Modified Poisson regression was used to obtain crude (relative risk [RR]) and adjusted relative risk [aRR] and 95% CIs and to quantify the contribution of maternal, obstetric, fetal, and neonatal factors to temporal variations in second-stage cesarean birth rates. All analyses were stratified by parity.
Results:
Among 806,645 births included, 26.7% of nulliparous and 6.5% of parous individuals had a second-stage cesarean birth or an operative vaginal birth, with ratios of cesarean to operative vaginal birth of 0.24 and 0.16, respectively. Between 2012-2013 and 2020-2021, second-stage cesarean birth rates increased from 4.8% to 5.8% for nulliparous individuals (P for trend<.001, RR 1.16, 95% CI, 1.08-1.24) and from 0.8% to 1.0% for multiparous individuals (P for trend<.001, RR 1.30, 95% CI, 1.11-1.51), as did ratios of cesarean to operative vaginal birth (nulliparous individuals 0.22-0.27, P<.001; multiparous individuals 0.13-0.18, P<.001). Factors strongly associated with second-stage cesarean birth included macrosomia, previous cesarean birth, elevated body mass index, and care by a midwife or family physician. After adjustment for maternal and obstetric factors, the increase in second-stage cesarean birth rates was largely attenuated (nulliparous individuals aRR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.97-1.11; multiparous individuals aRR 1.04, 95% CI, 0.89-1.21), with obstetric practice factors accounting for the largest proportion of the increase (nulliparous individuals 46.3% of the 16.0% increase; multiparous individuals 48.6% of the 29.6% increase).
Conclusion:
Between 2012 and 2021, second-stage cesarean birth rates and ratios of cesarean to operative vaginal birth increased in Ontario, Canada. Changes in obstetric practices were the primary modifiable drivers of this trend.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Current Trends in Nursing II
Current Trends in Nursing I
Population Growth
Issues And Trends In Healthcare Delivery System
Cost Containment
Payment for healthcare services has historically promoted adoption of costly and often unnecessary or inefficient...
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...

