Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

An Experimental Paradigm for the Prediction of Post-Operative Pain PPOP
Published on: January 27, 2010
Pain With Early Postpartum Intrauterine Device Placement
Holly H Berkley1, Monica A Lutgendorf1, Gennifer Kully1
1Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, and the Division of Complex Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; the Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecologic Surgery and Obstetrics, and the Department of Preventative Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, Maryland; the Division of Complex Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; and the Division of Complex Family Planning, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico.
Objective:
To compare pain between early and interval postpartum intrauterine device (IUD) placement.
Methods:
This is a planned secondary outcome analysis of a randomized trial among 404 participants randomized to early (14-28 days) or interval (42-56 days) postpartum IUD placement. Participants reported pain using a 100-mm visual analog scale at three times during IUD placement (bimanual examination, speculum placement, and IUD placement). We estimated that 112 participants would be required to achieve 80% power with an α of 5% to detect a 15-mm difference in pain with IUD placement. We used linear mixed models adjusting for demographic differences to compare mean pain scores between groups and per-protocol sensitivity analyses to account for crossover.
Results:
We enrolled 404 participants between March 2018 and July 2021; 325 received IUDs and were included in the analysis of pain with placement. Mean pain scores reported were not different between the early and interval groups: bimanual (9.2 mm vs 6.95 mm, mean difference 2.25 mm [95% CI, -2.68 to7.17], P=.37, respectively); speculum (16.95 mm vs 15.86 mm, mean difference 1.09 mm [95% CI, -3.38 to 6.0], P=.66); and IUD placement (18.43 mm vs 20.9 mm, mean difference -2.47 mm [95% CI, -7.39 to 2.44], P=.32). In the per-protocol analysis, pain scores were not meaningfully different from those in the primary intention-to-treat analysis.
Conclusion:
Pain reported is not different among people who are postpartum having early and interval IUD placement. Understanding the experience of pain with early and interval placement may help clinicians support patients in making informed choices about the timing of IUD placement.
Clinical Trial Registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03462758.
Related Concept Videos
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Appendicitis-I: Introduction
Etiology: Appendicitis can arise from various causes, primarily rooted in the obstruction of the appendix lumen. Factors contributing to this obstruction include fecal accumulation, lymphoid hyperplasia and, in...
Disorders of the Female Reproductive System
Local Anesthetics: Clinical Application as Epidural Anesthesia
Since epidural anesthetics can be infused through an epidural catheter, all types of drugs, including short-acting ones, can be administered. Chloroprocaine and lidocaine are examples of short and long-duration anesthetics, respectively. Bupivacaine...
Endocarditis IV: Nursing Management
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview

