Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Estimating Bilateral Atrial Function by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Feature Tracking in Patients with Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation
Published on: July 20, 2022
Incidence and Outcomes of Atrial Fibrillation and Systolic Dysfunction in Patients Receiving Mavacamten for
Olives Nguyen1, Jack Wiedrick1, Daniele Massera2
1Knight Cardiovascular Institute, Oregon Health & Science University (Portland, OR, USA).
Importance:
Mavacamten is highly effective in treating symptomatic obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM) and was approved for commercial use with a risk mitigation program (REMS) to monitor the impact on left ventricular systolic function (LVSD). The impact of mavacamten on atrial fibrillation (AF) occurrence is not well characterized.
Objective:
Determine the real-world incidence of new-onset and recurrent AF among patients with HCM treated with commercial mavacamten. Secondary objectives included assessing the incidences of LVSD, heart failure (HF), and cardiogenic shock.
Design:
A multicenter cohort study. Center-level data were aggregated for patients who received mavacamten from May 2022 through December 2024.
Setting:
Twenty-one outpatient HCM centers in the United States.
Participants:
Consecutive patients ≥18 years of age with oHCM were included; those with permanent AF were excluded.
Exposures:
At least one dose of commercial mavacamten.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Incidence of new-onset and recurrent AF, LVSD, HF, and cardiogenic shock.
Results:
Among 1,538 patients (median age, 66 years [95% CI, 65.9-66.1]; 57% female [95% CI, 54-59%]), 25% [95% CI, 22-27%] had prior AF. Median mavacamten exposure was 13.4 months [95% CI, 11.8-15.0]. Overall AF incidence was 13% [95% CI, 10-17%], including 5% [95% CI, 4-7%] new-onset and 39% [95% CI, 27-51%] recurrent AF in those with history of AF prior to mavacamten initiation. LVEF <50% occurred in 8% [95% CI, 6-9%], of whom 70% had AF. Symptomatic HF occurred in 1.5% [95% CI, 0.8-2.2%], cardiogenic shock in 0.6% [95% CI, 0.1-1.0%], and an overall permanent discontinuation of mavacamten in 7% [95% CI, 4-10%].
Conclusions And Relevance:
In this multicenter cohort receiving commercial mavacamten, we identified an annual incidence of 5% new-onset AF and 39% recurrent AF, while 70% of patients who developed LVEF<50% had concurrent AF. Given this association and the morbidity that can be associated with AF, protocols for LVEF assessment and aggressive rhythm management following AF detection may be warranted to improve patient care. Further studies are needed to improve understanding of the impact of mavacamten on AF and patient outcomes.
More Related Videos
12:45Benefits of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in an Asynchronous Heart Failure Model Induced by Left Bundle Branch Ablation and Rapid Pacing
Published on: December 11, 2017
08:42Cox-Maze IV Procedure Concomitant with Valvular Surgery In Situs Inversus Dextrocardia: A Single-Center Experience in China
Published on: February 11, 2022
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Valve Prolapse I: Introduction
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management