Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Activity of TheraBreath™ Oral Rinses: An In Vitro Study

Background/Objectives: There are many commercial mouthrinses, used for a variety of purposes, including antiseptic activity. The objective of this study was to determine the antibacterial activity of various TheraBreath™ oral rinses against the cariogenic bacterium, Streptococcus mutans, and saliva-derived microbial communities, and their antibiofilm activity against S. mutans in vitro biofilms. Methods: Bactericidal activity against planktonic S. mutans was assessed by colony counting after 30 and 2 min exposures to mouthrinses. Ten saliva samples were exposed to mouthrinses for 30 s and plated aerobically on blood agar and Mitis Salivarius agar. Mature biofilms of S. mutans were treated with mouthrinses for 15 min followed by fluorescent vitality staining and polysaccharide measurement, followed by crystal violet staining for measurement of total biofilm remaining. Statistical analysis was performed using Kruskal-Wallis with Dunn's multiple comparisons test comparing all mean ranks (α = 0.05). Results: TheraBreath™ Fresh Breath, Healthy Smile, and Dry Mouth exhibited no significant antibacterial activity. TheraBreath™ Healthy Gums showed antibacterial activity against S. mutans and microbes from saliva samples similar to Listerine^® Naturals at all exposure times. Whitening Fresh Breath showed intermediate killing of S. mutans after 30 min in liquid but not after 2 min or against salivary microbes. Live/Dead fluorescence vitality staining showed that Healthy Gums and Whitening Fresh Breath had antibacterial activity against mature biofilms of S. mutans statistically similar to Listerine^® Naturals and Colgate^® Total; however, Whitening Fresh Breath did not have significant killing compared to PBS. Conclusions: TheraBreath™ Healthy Gums demonstrated similar antiseptic activity levels to other antiseptic-claiming commercial rinses. Whitening Fresh Breath was comparable but unable to kill in short exposure times.