Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Full-root Aortic Valve Replacement by Stentless Aortic Xenografts in Patients with Small Aortic Roots
Published on: May 21, 2017
Long-Term Outcomes in Aortic Stenosis: Mortality Analysis in a Selected Patient Group
Olga Irtyuga1, Mary Babakekhyan1, Oleg Metsker1
1Federal State Budgetary Institution "V.A. Almazov National Medical Research Centre" of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, 197341 Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
Aortic stenosis (AS) affects men and women differently, with higher mortality in AS patients. Beta-blockers improve survival, while certain drug combinations are dangerous, highlighting the need for personalized AS management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Valvular Heart Disease
- Epidemiology
Background:
- Aortic stenosis (AS) is a common acquired heart valve disease, particularly in older adults.
- Gender-specific differences in AS presentation, comorbidities, and outcomes require further investigation for personalized treatment.
- Understanding these differences is crucial for optimizing patient care and improving survival rates.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze clinical and demographic characteristics, comorbidities, and survival outcomes in patients with AS.
- To stratify AS patients by gender and aortic valve morphology (bicuspid aortic valve [BAV] vs. tricuspid aortic valve [TAV]).
- To identify factors influencing survival in AS patients.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 145,454 echocardiographic examinations (2009-2018).
- Inclusion criteria: Vmax ≥ 2.0 m/s, age ≥ 18 years (84,851 patients).
- Survival analysis over 16 years (2009-2025) using Kaplan-Meier, with statistical comparisons via STATISTICA v. 10.0.
Main Results:
- AS patients (men: 4998, women: 6322) were older and had higher blood pressure than non-AS patients.
- Men with AS had higher hyperlipidemia rates; women had increased coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, and obesity.
- Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) was more prevalent (54.5% men, 66.4% women); overall mortality reached 21.7% over 16 years.
Conclusions:
- Mortality in AS patients is significant (21.7%), influenced by age, aortic regurgitation, increased jet velocity, and aortic diameter.
- Beta-blocker therapy improved survival, while ARB/CCB combinations were detrimental.
- Aortic valve replacement showed an insignificant effect; absence of anticoagulants and presence of antiarrhythmics/statins correlated with better outcomes.
More Related Videos
14:14Standardized Technique of Aortic Valve Re-implantation for Valve-sparing Aortic Root Replacement
Published on: December 11, 2017
06:51Author Spotlight: Development of a Minimally Invasive Large-Animal Model for Reliable and Reproducible Cardiovascular Research
Published on: October 20, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Aortic Regurgitation I: Introduction
Actuarial Approach
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Aortic Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Aortic Regurgitation IV: Nursing Management
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies