Defining paediatric abusive head trauma using routinely collected patient datasets: Scoping review and testing in a

Joni Jackson1, Lauren J Scott1, Sarah Dawson1

  • 1The National Institute for Health Research Applied Health and Care Research Collaboration West (NIHR ARC West) at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, UK; Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Whitefriars, Bristol, BS1 2NT, UK.

Child Abuse & Neglect
|September 26, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Identifying abusive head trauma (AHT) is challenging due to poor coding. This study found wide incidence variations in UK primary care data, highlighting the need for standardized definitions to improve AHT case identification.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatrics
  • Public Health
  • Data Science

Background:

  • Abusive head trauma (AHT) is underreported and poorly coded in patient data, hindering identification, especially in non-hospitalized cases.
  • Existing AHT definitions primarily rely on hospital data and may not be suitable for routine primary care settings.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify definitions of AHT used in routine patient data.
  • To compare the impact of different AHT definitions on incidence estimates within a UK primary care cohort.

Main Methods:

  • A scoping review identified 29 AHT definitions from 40 studies, primarily using hospital-based ICD codes.
  • These definitions were applied to a UK primary care cohort (infants under 1 year, 2013-2021) linked to secondary care and A&E data.
  • Incidence rates were calculated per 100,000 person-years to assess variability.

Main Results:

  • Most identified AHT definitions were based on hospital data (ICD-9-CM, ICD-10) and not validated for UK primary care.
  • Applying these definitions to the UK primary care cohort yielded incidence estimates ranging from 9-15 per 100,000 person-years for "probable" or "presumptive" AHT.
  • Broader definitions, including "possible" AHT, resulted in higher incidence estimates, up to 49 per 100,000 person-years.

Conclusions:

  • The significant variability in AHT incidence estimates underscores the inadequacy of current definitions for UK primary care datasets.
  • A standardized AHT definition tailored for UK primary care data is crucial for accurate case identification and epidemiological studies.
Abstract

Related Concept Videos