Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Optimized Management of Endovascular Treatment for Acute Ischemic Stroke
Published on: January 18, 2018
Artificial Intelligence for Ischemic Stroke Detection in Non-contrast CT: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Wenzhuo Shen1, Jihong Peng2, Jie Lu1
1Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, No. 45 Changchun Street, Xicheng District, Beijing 100053, China (W.S., J.L.); Beijing Key Laboratory of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Brain Informatics, Beijing 100053, China (W.S., J.L.).
Artificial intelligence (AI) shows acceptable performance in detecting ischemic stroke (IS) on non-contrast CT (NCCT) during internal validation. However, limited external validation restricts its real-world clinical applicability.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
- Neurology
Background:
- Ischemic stroke (IS) diagnosis relies on non-contrast CT (NCCT).
- Artificial intelligence (AI) models are emerging tools for medical image analysis.
- Assessing AI's diagnostic accuracy for IS in NCCT is crucial.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review and meta-analyze the diagnostic accuracy of AI models for IS detection in NCCT.
- To compare the diagnostic performance of AI models against clinicians.
- To evaluate the impact of AI assistance on clinician performance.
Main Methods:
- Systematic literature search conducted until February 2025 across major databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane, IEEE Xplore, Embase).
- Inclusion of studies using AI on human NCCT images for IS detection/classification.
- Risk of bias assessed using PROBAST; meta-analysis employed pooled sensitivities, specificities, and HSROC curves.
Main Results:
- AI demonstrated pooled sensitivity of 91.2% and specificity of 96.0% in internal validation (74 trials from 32 studies).
- External validation showed lower AI sensitivity (59.8%) but high specificity (97.3%).
- Clinicians' performance improved with AI assistance (sensitivity 83.7%, specificity 86.7%).
- Higher AI sensitivity linked to data augmentation and transfer learning techniques.
- Significant heterogeneity and high risk of bias (58% of studies) were noted.
Conclusions:
- AI exhibits acceptable diagnostic performance for IS detection in NCCT internally.
- Significant heterogeneity impacts meta-analysis findings.
- Limited external validation and generalizability hinder AI's immediate real-world clinical application.
More Related Videos
09:36A Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Computational Protocol for Analysis of Plaque Morphology and Hemodynamics in Patients with Carotid Artery Stenosis
Published on: August 12, 2025
09:59A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocol for Stroke Onset Time Estimation in Permanent Cerebral Ischemia
Published on: September 16, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System IV: CMRI