Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 20, 2026

In vivo Structural Assessments of Ocular Disease in Rodent Models using Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: July 24, 2020
Ocular Biometry and Refractive Prediction in Short Eyes: A Comparison of Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence
1Saevit Eye Hospital, 1065 Jungang-ro, Ilsandong-gu, Goyang 10447, Republic of Korea.
Abstract:
Purpose: To compare the performance of two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers in the measurement of ocular biometry and the prediction of postoperative refractive errors in eyes with short axial length (AL). Methods: A total of 48 eyes from 29 patients with AL ≤ 22 mm were included. AL, anterior chamber depth (ACD), keratometry (K), and lens thickness (LT) measured using the IOLMaster® 700 and ARGOS® before cataract surgery were compared. The refractive error prediction accuracy of the two devices was also compared. Results: This study included four men (7 eyes) and 25 women (41 eyes), with an average age of 70.7 ± 8.1 years (mean ± SD; range, 47-82 years). The two devices demonstrated good agreement in measurements of ocular biometry with high intraclass correlation coefficients (AL = 0.975; ACD = 0.957; K = 0.988; LT = 0.994). However, AL and ACD were significantly shorter when measured with the IOLMaster® 700 compared to the ARGOS® (p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in mean absolute prediction errors between the two devices (p = 0.423). The IOLMaster® 700 showed a significantly lower mean prediction error than the ARGOS® (+0.12 ± 0.39 diopters vs. +0.20 ± 0.39 diopters, p = 0.006), although the difference was of limited clinical relevance. There were no significant differences in the percentages of eyes within ± 0.50 D (77.1% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.811) and ± 1.00 D (100% vs. 97.9%, p = 0.315) of the predicted refractive error. Conclusions: Although IOLMaster® 700 and ARGOS® showed good agreements in eyes with short AL, significant differences were observed in the measurements of AL and ACD. Both devices demonstrated good efficacy and comparable performance in predicting postoperative refractive errors.
More Related Videos
03:35Determining Gender-Based Differences in Retinal and Choroidal Thickness in Underweight Individuals via Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography
Published on: December 1, 2023
05:14Comparison of Agreement and Accuracy using Binocular Wavefront Optometer with Autorefractor and Phoropter
Published on: September 16, 2025