A Safety Limit of the Number of Artificial Canals That Can Be Prepared by Two Rotary Endodontic Files Operated at Two...

Utilizing a novel approach that concomitantly assessed cyclic fatigue and torsional overloading, we aimed to establish the maximum number of artificial canals that can be prepared by Hyflex EDM and NeoNiTi A1 operated at two different speeds until their separation. Forty-eight files were equally divided into four groups: (A) Hyflex EDM operated at 300 rotations per minute (RPM) and (B) at 500 RPM, and (C) NeoNiTi A1 at 300 RPM and (D) at 500 RPM. Files were used to completely shape 10 sequential artificial canals unless file separation occurred. Maximum number of canals prepared was noted and averaged. Fractography was conducted to determine the mechanism of file separation. Hyflex EDM prepared significantly more canals compared to NeoNiTi A1 (p = 0.008). When operated at 300 RPM, Hyflex EDM prepared significantly more canals compared to NeoNiTi A1 (p = 0.028), whereas no significant difference was observed when they were operated at 500 RPM (p = 0.116). One NeoNiTi file broke due to cyclic fatigue while another one separated due to torsional overloading. Hyflex EDM files showed signs of both mechanisms. Within the limitations of this study, one file safely prepared four to five canals before its fracture. There was a trend towards fewer prepared canals as the RPM increased.