Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026
Computerized Adaptive Testing System of Functional Assessment of Stroke
Published on: January 7, 2019
ADL-Focused Occupation-Based Neurobehavioral Evaluation Software: Addition of a Rasch-Based Stroke Subscale to
Guðrún Árnadóttir1,2, Laufey Halla Atladóttir2, Garðar Ingvarsson3
1Landspitali, 105 Reykjavik, Iceland.
Abstract:
Background: Measurements are necessary in rehabilitation for evaluating service effectiveness. The ADL-focused Occupation-based Neurobehavioral Evaluation (A-ONE) is used for evaluating ADL performance and the impact of neurobehavioral impairments on the performance. Recently, Rasch-based software was constructed for the A-ONE ADL and neurobehavioral scales. It converts ordinal rating scale scores into measures, estimates missing data values and calculates the statistical significance of changes. Objectives: To expand the A-ONE software by developing a cerebrovascular accident (CVA) neurobehavioral subscale. Additionally, to pilot-test whether the ADL and CVA scales of the software can detect statistically significant improvements. Method: Rasch analysis was used for evaluating the item fit, PCA, person separation and reliability to establish the internal validity of the CVA subscale (n = 222). The external validity (n = 22) was obtained by comparing A-ONE software measures to Winsteps measures. Subsequently 21 pre-post-intervention comparisons were made of stroke patients using both the ADL and CVA scales. Results: All set criteria for internal and external validity were met. By using the software clinically after incorporating the CVA subscale, statistically significant changes were detected in 90.5% of comparisons using the ADL scale and 36.4% using the CVA scale. The intervention program used was determined to consist of 66.4% occupation-based activities. Conclusions: This study is the first to deliver a clinically deployable Rasch-based CVA subscale integrated into routine occupational therapy software. The A-ONE software offers considerable time saving for therapists and the potential to detect significant differences in performance and impairment impact. It contributes to the removal of clinical obstacles toward the use of the instrument as an outcome measure and encourages the use of measures in rehabilitation.
