Monitoring the Biological Impact and Therapeutic Potential of Intermittent Fasting in Oncology: Assessing Strategies...

Background: Intermittent fasting (IF) is emerging as a promising non-pharmacological intervention in oncology, with the potential to modulate key biological processes including metabolic reprogramming, inflammation, autophagy, and immune function, particularly through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway. However, translating IF into clinical practice requires robust tools to monitor its biological impact and therapeutic effectiveness. Objective: This narrative review aims to present and critically evaluate current diagnostic and monitoring strategies that can support the safe and effective integration of IF into oncological care. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/Medline, Science Direct, Scopus, Wiley Online Library, and Google Scholar using a combination of free-text and MeSH terms related to intermittent fasting, oncology, biomarkers, immunophenotyping, metabolic pathways, gut microbiome, and diagnostic imaging. Results: Two principal categories of monitoring objectives were identified. The first-mechanistic monitoring-focuses on elucidating IF-induced biological effects, including modulation of insulin/IGF-1 signaling, oxidative stress reduction, autophagy activation, immune reprogramming, and microbiome alterations. Advanced research tools such as single-cell RNA sequencing, proteomics, metabolomics, and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) assays offer high-resolution insights but currently remain limited to preclinical or translational settings due to cost and complexity. The second-clinical response monitoring-assesses IF's impact on treatment outcomes, including chemotherapy and immunotherapy response, toxicity reduction, tumor dynamics, and maintenance of nutritional and functional status. This requires clinically validated, accessible, and interpretable diagnostic tools. Conclusions: A dual-layered monitoring framework that integrates both mechanistic insights and clinical applicability is essential for the personalized implementation of IF in oncology. Although preliminary findings are promising, large-scale randomized trials with standardized protocols are necessary to confirm the efficacy, safety, and feasibility of IF in routine oncological care. The integration of IF with modern diagnostics may ultimately contribute to a more individualized, biologically informed cancer treatment paradigm.