Do Family Obligations Contribute to Academic Values? The Mediating Role of Academic Efficacy
View abstract on PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.Student academic efficacy influences motivation in STEM fields. Family obligations, like caregiving and financial duties, impact STEM utility values, often mediated by self-efficacy.
Area Of Science
- Educational Psychology
- Sociology of Education
Background
- Existing motivational theories often overlook cultural and situational contexts.
- Understanding student motivation in STEM requires examining broader influencing factors.
Purpose Of The Study
- To investigate how family obligations (caregiving, financial) affect STEM utility values.
- To examine the mediating role of academic efficacy in this relationship.
Main Methods
- Survey data from 1571 ethnically diverse college students at two research institutions.
- Analysis of factors influencing motivational utility values in STEM majors.
Main Results
- Academic efficacy mitigated the impact of caregiving obligations on perceived STEM utility.
- Financial family obligations influenced STEM utility values indirectly through self-efficacy.
Conclusions
- Self-efficacy is a key factor in how family obligations shape STEM motivation.
- Future research should consider cultural and familial contexts in STEM education.
Related Concept Videos
Self-efficacy is the belief in one's capacity to organize and execute actions necessary to manage prospective situations. This belief significantly influences how individuals approach goals, tasks, and challenges across different domains of life.Psychological and Educational ImpactsIndividuals with strong self-efficacy are more resilient in the face of difficulties. They are more likely to adopt effective problem-solving strategies, persist through obstacles, and regulate emotions such as...
Self-esteem is intricately tied to our perception of competence and our ability to exert control over our lives. One of the primary sources of this perception is performance feedback — the ongoing evaluation of our actions in terms of success and failure. According to Franks and Marolla (1976), people derive self-worth from experiencing themselves as causal agents, capable of achieving goals and overcoming obstacles. This process nurtures a critical component of self-esteem:...
According to George Herbert Mead, as children progress beyond the game stage, they develop a more comprehensive understanding of societal rules and norms. This cognitive and social development enables them to internalize the expectations of the broader community, refining their ability to regulate behavior.Consistent participation in organized activities is crucial in helping children recognize that their actions are not isolated but contribute to a more significant, interconnected group...
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
According to the self-discrepancy theory, people hold beliefs about what they’re really like—their actual self—as well as what they would ideally like to be—their ideal...
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Social comparison plays a fundamental role in the evaluation of personal success and self-worth. Rather than assessing our achievements in isolation, we interpret their significance relative to personal goals and critically in comparison to the performance of others. A grade of B in a mathematics exam might elicit pride if one's expectation was a C, yet result in disappointment if an A was anticipated or if peers achieved superior results. These comparative evaluations illustrate how both...

