Single or Double-Lumen Aspiration Needle? Revisiting Choices for In Vitro Fertilization or Intracytoplasmic Sperm...

Transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle aspiration remains the gold standard for oocyte retrieval in assisted reproductive technology (ART). This procedure employs either a single-lumen aspiration needle (SLN) or double-lumen aspiration needle (DLN), both of which are effective modalities for oocyte retrieval. The primary objective of this review is to systematically compare the impact and clinical outcomes associated with the use of SLN versus DLN in women undergoing ART. A systematic literature search was conducted across two databases, PubMed and Google Scholar, encompassing publications from their inception until May 2025, and articles published in English. A total of five studies were included in the final analysis. The oocyte yield and the number of MII oocyte did not differ significantly between the groups. Procedural duration was markedly shorter in the SLN group compared to the DLN group. No significant differences were observed in procedure-related complications across groups. Two randomized controlled trials reported comparable fertilization rates and numbers of high-quality embryos between the two needle types. Additionally, clinical pregnancy rates, ongoing pregnancy rates, and live birth rates were similar between the SLN and DLN groups. In conclusion, the utilization ofan SLN for oocyte retrieval demonstrates comparable efficacy to that of a DLN.