Carotid Doppler Imaging as a Marker for Fluid Responsiveness

Ankur Srivastava1, Christopher Tam1,2, Samir Sethi1,3

  • 1Department of Anesthesiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY 10065, USA.

Journal of Clinical Medicine
|September 27, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Carotid ultrasound (US) parameters did not correlate with pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO) in postcardiac surgery patients. Further research is needed to validate carotid point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) for assessing fluid responsiveness.

Area of Science:

  • Critical Care Medicine
  • Cardiovascular Physiology
  • Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS)

Background:

  • Hemodynamic instability management requires accurate fluid responsiveness assessment.
  • Traditional static measures like central venous pressure (CVP) have limitations.
  • Cardiac ultrasound (US), specifically carotid Doppler POCUS, shows potential for noninvasive fluid responsiveness evaluation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the correlation between carotid ultrasound (US) parameters and pulmonary artery catheter (PAC)-derived cardiac output (CO) in postcardiac surgery patients.
  • To assess the utility of carotid POCUS in identifying fluid-responsive patients.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study of 50 postcardiac surgery patients.
  • Carotid US and PAC CO measurements taken at four intervals around a passive leg raise (fluid challenge).
  • Pearson's correlation, linear regression, and Cohen's kappa used for analysis.

Main Results:

  • No significant correlation found between changes in carotid US parameters (ΔCDPV, FTc, carotid blood flow) and PAC cardiac index (CI).
  • A moderate correlation (r = 0.41, p = 0.005) observed between carotid blood flow and FTc at one hour post-fluid challenge.
  • Regression and sensitivity analyses revealed no significant associations.

Conclusions:

  • Carotid US parameters did not demonstrate correlation with PAC-derived CO following a passive leg raise.
  • The study did not validate carotid POCUS as a reliable tool for fluid responsiveness assessment in this patient cohort.
  • Further research is necessary to establish the role of carotid POCUS in managing hemodynamic instability.