Comparative Diagnostic and Prognostic Performance of SWI and T2-Weighted MRI in Cerebral Microbleed Detection

Rachel Tan1,2,3, Kevin J Spring1,2,4,5,6, Murray Killingsworth1,2,3,4,7

  • 1Global Health Neurology Lab, Sydney, NSW 2150, Australia.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)
|September 27, 2025
PubMed

Insights

Susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) detects more cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients than T2*-weighted imaging (T2*), showing stronger links to adverse outcomes. However, prognostic accuracy remains limited, highlighting the need for standardized protocols.

Area of Science:

  • Neurology
  • Radiology
  • Biomarkers

Background:

  • Cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are key indicators of small vessel disease and brain vulnerability in acute ischemic stroke (AIS).
  • Accurate CMB detection is vital for prognosis and treatment decisions in AIS patients.
  • The comparative effectiveness of susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) and T2*-weighted imaging (T2*) for CMB detection and prognostic value is not fully established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To systematically review and meta-analyze the prevalence and prognostic implications of CMBs detected by SWI and T2* in AIS patients.
  • To compare the diagnostic performance of SWI and T2* in identifying CMBs.
  • To assess the association between CMBs and key adverse outcomes following AIS.

Main Methods:

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis (SPOT-CMB study) of 80 studies involving 28,383 AIS patients.
  • Pooled prevalence of CMBs was calculated for SWI, T2*, and combined modalities.
  • Meta-analytic odds ratios and receiver operating characteristic curves were used to evaluate associations with symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage, hemorrhagic transformation, and poor functional outcome, as well as diagnostic performance.

Main Results:

  • Pooled CMB prevalence was higher with SWI (36%) compared to T2* (25%).
  • CMB presence correlated with increased odds of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (OR 2.22), hemorrhagic transformation (OR 1.33), and poor 90-day functional outcome (OR 1.61).
  • SWI demonstrated superior detection but limited prognostic gain; diagnostic performance metrics were modest.

Conclusions:

  • SWI is more sensitive than T2* for detecting CMBs in AIS patients and shows stronger associations with adverse outcomes, supporting its role in risk stratification.
  • Despite clinical utility, the prognostic accuracy of CMB detection remains limited, with moderate certainty for functional outcomes and lower certainty for diagnostic accuracy.
  • Challenges in global implementation exist due to limited SWI availability, emphasizing the need for standardized protocols and further high-quality research.

Related Concept Videos