Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Fully Endoscopic Mitral Valve Repair with Percutaneous Cannulation of Groin Vessels
Published on: May 26, 2023
Repair Versus Replacement in Mitral Valve Endocarditis Due to Methicillin-Susceptible Staphylococcus aureus
Zaki Haidari1, Iskandar Turaev1, Stephan Knipp1
1Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, West German Heart and Vascular Centre, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45147 Essen, Germany.
Abstract:
Background: The guidelines recommend mitral valve repair whenever possible in patients undergoing surgical treatment for active infective endocarditis of the native mitral valve. However, the impact of causative microorganisms in relation to treatment strategies, especially Staphylococcus aureus, has not been studied. In this study, we aimed to compare the outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with native mitral valve infective endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. Methods: Consecutive patients with definitive active infective endocarditis of the native mitral valve caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus undergoing cardiac surgery between 2012 and 2022 were selected. Patients were classified according to the treatment received in two groups: repair and replacement. Inverse propensity treatment weighting was employed to correct for confounders. The endpoints were all-cause mortality, incidence of recurrent endocarditis, reoperation rate, and event-free survival at two-year follow-up. Results: Among 170 operated-upon patients with active infective endocarditis of the native mitral valve, 44 cases were caused by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus. A total of 23 patients underwent mitral valve repair and 21 patients received mitral valve replacement. Weighted 30-day mortality in the repair group was 43%, versus 27% in the replacement group (p = 0.15). Two-year mortality increased to 57% in the repair group and 32% in the replacement group (p = 0.02). Three patients developed recurrent endocarditis in the repair group, while no recurrent endocarditis occurred in the replacement group. Three patients in the repair group required reoperation due to recurrence and one patient in the replacement group underwent re-operation due to paravalvular leakage. Weighted two-year event-free survival was 29% in the repair group and 59% in the replacement group (p < 0.01). Conclusions: Mortality in patients with mitral valve infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus is extremely high, especially in patients undergoing mitral valve repair. The risk of recurrent endocarditis and mid-term mortality seems to be higher in mitral valve repair, resulting in poor event-free survival during two-year follow-up. However, the sample size was likely insufficient for drawing definitive conclusions.
Insights
Mitral valve repair for Staphylococcus aureus infective endocarditis shows higher mortality and recurrence than replacement. Event-free survival was significantly lower in the repair group, suggesting replacement may be a safer option.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Surgical Innovation
Background:
- Current guidelines favor mitral valve repair for active native mitral valve infective endocarditis.
- The specific impact of Staphylococcus aureus on repair versus replacement outcomes remains understudied.
- This study investigates methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) as a causative agent.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare outcomes of mitral valve repair versus replacement in patients with MSSA native mitral valve infective endocarditis.
- To evaluate the influence of causative microorganisms on treatment strategy effectiveness.
- To assess mortality, recurrence, reoperation, and survival rates.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 170 patients with native mitral valve infective endocarditis (2012-2022).
- Focus on 44 cases caused by MSSA, divided into repair (23) and replacement (21) groups.
- Inverse propensity treatment weighting used to adjust for confounders; two-year follow-up endpoints.
Main Results:
- Two-year mortality was significantly higher in the repair group (57%) compared to replacement (32%) (p=0.02).
- Recurrent endocarditis occurred in 3 repair patients vs. 0 replacement patients.
- Weighted two-year event-free survival was substantially lower for repair (29%) versus replacement (59%) (p<0.01).
Conclusions:
- Mitral valve infective endocarditis caused by Staphylococcus aureus is associated with extremely high mortality, particularly with repair.
- Mitral valve repair in MSSA endocarditis appears to carry a higher risk of recurrence and mid-term mortality.
- While findings suggest replacement may be superior, the small sample size necessitates cautious interpretation.
Related Concept Videos
Mitral Stenosis III: Medical Management
Endocarditis III: Medical Management
Mitral Regurgitation III: Medical Management
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Mitral Valve Prolapse II: Assessment and Management
Endocarditis I: Introduction

