Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Isolation and Genome Analysis of Single Virions using 'Single Virus Genomics'
Published on: May 26, 2013
Living Together Apart: Quantitative Perspectives on the Costs and Benefits of a Multipartite Genome Organization in
Marcelle L Johnson1,2, Dieke Boezen1,2, Alexey A Grum-Grzhimaylo1,3
1Department of Microbial Ecology, Netherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW), 6700 AB Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Background:
Multipartite viruses individually package their multiple genome segments into virus particles, necessitating the transmission of multiple virus particles for effective viral spread. This dependence poses a cost in the form of reduced transmission compared to monopartite viruses, which only have a single genome segment. The notable cost of a multipartite genome organization has spurred debate on why multipartite viruses are so common among plant viruses, including a search for benefits associated with this organizational form.
Methods:
We investigated the costs and benefits of multipartite viruses with three approaches. First, we reanalyzed dose-response data to measure the cost of multipartition to between-host transmission for multipartite viruses. Second, we developed a simulation model to explore when the sharing of viral gene products between cells is beneficial. Third, we tested whether multipartite viruses have a broad host range by estimating the host range for plant viruses using metagenomics data.
Results:
We find that the observed cost to transmission exceeds theoretical predictions. We predict that a virus gene-product-sharing strategy only confers benefits under limited conditions, suggesting that this strategy may not be common. Our results suggest that multipartite and segmented viruses have broader host ranges than monopartite viruses.
Conclusions:
Our analyses also suggest there is limited evidence for the costs and benefits of a multipartite organization, and we argue that the diversity of multipartite virus-host systems demands pluralistic explanatory frameworks.
Insights
Multipartite viruses face transmission costs but may have broader host ranges. Limited evidence supports benefits of gene sharing, suggesting complex explanations for their prevalence.
Area of Science:
- Virology
- Evolutionary Biology
- Plant Pathology
Background:
- Multipartite viruses package genome segments separately, requiring multiple particles for transmission.
- This contrasts with monopartite viruses and incurs transmission costs, prompting research into multipartite virus advantages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To quantify transmission costs of multipartite viruses.
- To evaluate the benefits of viral gene product sharing between cells.
- To determine if multipartite viruses possess broader host ranges.
Main Methods:
- Reanalyzed dose-response data to assess transmission costs.
- Developed a simulation model for viral gene product sharing benefits.
- Used metagenomics to estimate host ranges of plant viruses.
Main Results:
- Observed transmission costs exceed theoretical predictions.
- Viral gene product sharing benefits are conditional and likely uncommon.
- Multipartite and segmented viruses exhibit broader host ranges than monopartite viruses.
Conclusions:
- Evidence for multipartite organization costs/benefits is limited.
- Broader host ranges may explain multipartite virus prevalence.
- Diverse multipartite virus-host systems require multifaceted explanations.
Related Concept Videos
Size and Structure of Viral Genomes
Genomics
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
Genome Size and the Evolution of New Genes
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Viruses with RNA Genomes

