Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 16, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
Evaluating the Study Designs and Outcome Measures Used in Service User Involvement in Health Professional Entry-Level
Jonathan Green1, Jennifer Oates1, Sam Robertson2
1School of Health Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.
Background:
It is a regulatory requirement in the United Kingdom and Australia that people who use services are involved in health professional education. Evaluating service user involvement aims to inform curriculum development and improvement. However, although there is research evaluating service user involvement in medical education, optimal outcome measures for other health professionals have not been identified.
Objective:
This study focused on service user involvement in entry-level education for nurses, midwives, allied health professionals, social workers and pharmacists. The aim was to (i) identify study characteristics, designs and methods used to measure outcomes, (ii) describe the characteristics of outcome measures used and (iii) identify the extent to which the outcome measures aligned with the modified Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework.
Search Strategy:
Medline, CINAHL and PsychINFO databases were systematically searched for studies published over a 24-year period between 2000 and 2024. Two reviewers independently screened studies. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Measures were mapped to the modified Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework.
Results:
Nineteen studies using 29 measures were selected. Study designs were mostly quasi-experimental with small university-based samples. Data were typically collected pre- and post-service user involvement, assessing changes in student knowledge and attitudes. Measures assessed the perspective of students (n = 29) and educators (n = 1), but not the service users' perspective (n = 0). Eight of the measures were validated; four for student health professionals and four for other populations. No measures aligned with the highest levels of the modified Kirkpatrick Evaluation Framework regarding the impact of service user involvement on the health system and patients.
Conclusion:
Limitations in the study designs reduced the comparability and generalisability of the identified studies. None of the measures evaluated the impact of service user involvement on the health system or patients. Educators' perspectives on the service users' involvement in the education were limited. Service users' perspectives were absent. To embed a culture of involvement, future research is needed to identify the requirements of outcome measures from the perspective of service users and educators.
Patient And Public Contribution:
Co-author (S.R.), a lead for service user and carer involvement at an NHS Trust, guided the study design, data analysis and manuscript development.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Nursing Interventions II: Selecting and Classifying the Nursing Interventions
Nursing Evaluation
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

